2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact model for short-channel symmetric double-gate junctionless transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is not possible to get an analytic solution for the surface potential in (2), an iterative solution is showed in [18], where a precision better than 0.01% is obtained with a maximum of two iterations.…”
Section: Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is not possible to get an analytic solution for the surface potential in (2), an iterative solution is showed in [18], where a precision better than 0.01% is obtained with a maximum of two iterations.…”
Section: Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, expressions for functions SaN, Sb, SaP are defined in [18]. The final expression for the total drain current valid in both regimes is equal to:…”
Section: Drain Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the long‐channel approximation, analytical models including charge‐based potential, full range current model, variation of the threshold voltage caused by random dopant fluctuations, and technological constrains and design limitations have been investigated and developed for JL MOSFETs. Also, using the minimum central potential, the threshold voltage shift and the subthreshold slope for symmetric JL MOSFETs working in depletion and accumulation conditions have been determined and compared with the experimental results …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, using the minimum central potential, the threshold voltage shift and the subthreshold slope for symmetric JL MOSFETs working in depletion and accumulation conditions have been determined and compared with the experimental results. 8,9 From the other point of view, some studies have investigated the effects of the fixed oxide charges at the Si-SiO 2 interface on the threshold voltage and other electrical properties of the JLDG MOSFETs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Generally, there are 4 kinds of trapped charges at the Si-SiO 2 interface in the MOSFETs: (1) the fixed oxide charges that are due to structural defects (ionized silicon) in the oxide layer; (2) the mobile oxide charges that are caused by ionic impurities like Na + ; (3) the oxide trapped charges that are due to holes or electrons trapped in the bulk of the oxide by ionizing radiation, avalanche injection, tunneling, or other mechanisms; and (4) the interface trapped charges that are due to bond breaking processes like hot electrons in which the high electric field causes the impact ionization of the carriers and the generated hot electrons are injected into the Si-SiO 2 interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%