2014
DOI: 10.1097/phh.0b013e3182980ca2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Data

Abstract: Statistical analyses of these data are challenging due to high rates of censoring and uncertainty about the appropriateness of parametric assumptions for time-series data. Although monitoring frequency was consistent with regulations, the magnitude of time gaps coupled with uncertainty about CWS service areas may limit linkage with health outcome data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, much more water quality data is collected relative to the amount of data analysis conducted [34]. There are several possible reasons for this discrepancy: (1) statistical analyses of drinking water quality data are still challenging because of non-normal distributions and missing values [35,36]; (2) for time-based or seasonal models, the frequency is often not sufficient to overcome variability and uncertainty; and (3) it is difficult to summarize the time-space dimensions of water quality data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, much more water quality data is collected relative to the amount of data analysis conducted [34]. There are several possible reasons for this discrepancy: (1) statistical analyses of drinking water quality data are still challenging because of non-normal distributions and missing values [35,36]; (2) for time-based or seasonal models, the frequency is often not sufficient to overcome variability and uncertainty; and (3) it is difficult to summarize the time-space dimensions of water quality data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%