2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple imputation for assessment of exposures to drinking water contaminants: Evaluation with the Atrazine Monitoring Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors then suggest applying multiple imputation to fill in water quality values between measurements in CWSs [37]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors then suggest applying multiple imputation to fill in water quality values between measurements in CWSs [37]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the mean monthly estimates, we calculated the mean atrazine concentrations for the entire gestational period of the pregnancy (“gestational atrazine”) as well as for each trimester of pregnancy, based on date of birth and gestational age at birth. The limit of detection for atrazine was 0.1 µg/L in 2006 and was 0.05 µg/L in 2007 and 2008 [ 29 ]. Measurements below the limit of detection (LOD) were assigned a value of the LOD/2 in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous applications of MI to environmental data have found the method to effectively recover missing information, 9,10,16 which suggests that the method may recover missing information in the context of CHEERS. To our knowledge, however, the MI method has not been applied to microbial surface water quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%