Abstract:Pediatric disparities disproportionately affect Latino youth undergoing surgery and their families. As such, there is a critical need for culturally relevant frameworks that can advance perioperative intervention approaches in this population and reduce these disparities. In the following article, we first describe the methodological process of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and next report the results of the CBPR process that was conducted in this population. An interdisciplinary group of inves… Show more
“…Future studies are needed to better assess specific mechanisms underlying parent decision-making. Triangulating methods to include qualitative and community-based approaches where community collaborators are involved in data interpretation may be particularly beneficial [21]. It is important to clarify that the literature does not have a clear indication that the use of caudal regional block vs. local anesthetic is considered a gold standard.…”
Background: Family-centered care aims to consider family preferences and values in care delivery. Our study examines parent decisions regarding anesthesia type (caudal regional block or local anesthesia) among a diverse sample of children undergoing urologic surgeries. Differences in anesthesia type were examined by known predictors of health disparities, including child race/ethnicity, parental English proficiency, and a proxy for household income. Methods: A retrospective review of 4739 patients (including 25.4% non-Latino/a White, 8.7% non- Latino/a Asians, 7.3% non-Latino/a Black, 23.1% Latino/a, and 35.4% others) undergoing urologic surgeries from 2016 to 2020 using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: 62.1% of Latino/a parents and 60.8% of non-Latino/a Black parents did not agree to a regional block. 65.1% of Spanish-speaking parents with limited English Proficiency did not agree to a regional block. Of parents from households below poverty lines, 61.7% did not agree to a caudal regional block. In regression analysis, Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black youth were less likely to receive caudal regional block than non- Latino/a White patients. Conclusions: We found disparities in the use of pediatric pain management techniques. Understanding mechanisms underlying Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black parental preferences may help providers reduce these disparities.
“…Future studies are needed to better assess specific mechanisms underlying parent decision-making. Triangulating methods to include qualitative and community-based approaches where community collaborators are involved in data interpretation may be particularly beneficial [21]. It is important to clarify that the literature does not have a clear indication that the use of caudal regional block vs. local anesthetic is considered a gold standard.…”
Background: Family-centered care aims to consider family preferences and values in care delivery. Our study examines parent decisions regarding anesthesia type (caudal regional block or local anesthesia) among a diverse sample of children undergoing urologic surgeries. Differences in anesthesia type were examined by known predictors of health disparities, including child race/ethnicity, parental English proficiency, and a proxy for household income. Methods: A retrospective review of 4739 patients (including 25.4% non-Latino/a White, 8.7% non- Latino/a Asians, 7.3% non-Latino/a Black, 23.1% Latino/a, and 35.4% others) undergoing urologic surgeries from 2016 to 2020 using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: 62.1% of Latino/a parents and 60.8% of non-Latino/a Black parents did not agree to a regional block. 65.1% of Spanish-speaking parents with limited English Proficiency did not agree to a regional block. Of parents from households below poverty lines, 61.7% did not agree to a caudal regional block. In regression analysis, Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black youth were less likely to receive caudal regional block than non- Latino/a White patients. Conclusions: We found disparities in the use of pediatric pain management techniques. Understanding mechanisms underlying Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black parental preferences may help providers reduce these disparities.
“…This approach can be particularly valuable for addressing disparities in research participation. An example of community-based participatory research in pediatric perioperative care with Latino youth undergoing surgery and their families is described by Rosales et al 74 with the goal to reduce disparities in perioperative intervention approaches in minority populations.…”
Section: Trial Design and Treatment Deliverymentioning
Introduction:Disabling chronic pain is a common experience for children and adolescents. However, the evidence base for chronic pain interventions for youth is extremely limited, which has hindered the development of evidence-based practice guidelines for most pediatric chronic pain conditions.Objectives:To review and provide recommendations on clinical trial design and evaluation in children and adolescents with chronic pain.Methods:In this article, we summarize key issues and provide recommendations for addressing them in clinical trials of chronic pain interventions in children and adolescents and their families.Results:To stimulate high-quality trials of pediatric chronic pain management interventions, attention to key issues including sample characterization, trial design and treatment administration, outcome measurement, and the ethics of intervening with children and adolescents, as opposed to adults with chronic pain, is needed.Conclusion:Future research to develop interventions to reduce or prevent childhood chronic pain is an important priority area, and requires special considerations in implementation and evaluation in clinical trials.
“…Researchers can engage in them by, for example, positioning the community as a focal unit of identity, and facilitating an equitable, power-sharing partnership to address social inequities 6. Although CBPR approaches have been used to address children’s health and care more broadly,9 10 they are rarely used to understand children’s injury prevention needs 6 11. CBPR approaches to injury prevention are important to employ with children, as they can be used to mitigate injury experiences in diverse populations,1 3 and they can result in the development of programmes, initiatives and practices that support physical activity and outdoor learning 12 13…”
BackgroundCommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to injury prevention are conducted so as to foster inclusiveness and collaboration in research processes and settings. Despite the benefits of using CBPR approaches to represent voices in research that are typically marginalised, they are overwhelmingly used in collaborations with youth and adults. Developing a child-centred CBPR approach can serve the important purpose of fostering awareness for children’s voices and needs in injury prevention, and can help future researchers engage communities of children in a genuine and respectful way.PurposeTo develop a four-staged model of a child-centred CBPR approach to injury prevention and outline the development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.