Background: Methylnaltrexone, a peripheral opioid antagonist, is used to decrease opioid-induced constipation; however, there is limited evidence for its use in children. The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of per os (PO) methylnaltrexone in inducing bowel movements (BMs) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSFI). Secondary outcomes include hospital length of stay, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative opioid usage. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified all adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients above 10 years of age who underwent PSFI with a minimum of 24 hours of postoperative opioid analgesia after the initiation of the new bowel regimen protocol. The bowel regimen included daily administration of PO methylnaltrexone starting on postoperative day 1 until BM is achieved. A case-matched cohort was obtained with patients who did not receive PO methylnaltrexone and otherwise had the same bowel function regimen. Case-matched controls were also matched for age, sex, body mass index, and curve severity. t Tests and Pearson χ 2 tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Fifty-two patients received oral methylnaltrexone (14 ± 2.6 y) and 52 patients were included in the case-matched control group (14 ± 2.1 y). The methylnaltrexone group had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (3.09 ± 0.66) compared with controls (3.69 ± 0.80) (P < 0.01). 59% (31 of 52) of the methylnaltrexone group had a BM by postoperative day postoperative day 2, compared with 30% (16 of 52) of the control group (P < 0.01). In the methylnaltrexone group, 44% (23 of 52) of the patients required a Dulcolax (bisacodyl) suppository and 11% (6 of 52) required an enema, compared with 50% (26 of 52) and 33% (12 of 52) of the control group respectively (P = 0.43 and 0.12). In addition, significantly less patients had abdominal distension during their postoperative stay in the methylnaltrexone group (17%, 9 of 52) compared with the control group (40%, 21 of 52) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in selfreported average FACES pain score (P = 0.39) or in opioid morphine equivalents required per hour (P = 0.18). Conclusions: Patients who received PO methylnaltrexone after PSFI had decreased length of stay and improved bowel function. Administration of methylnaltrexone did not increase maximum self-reported FACES pain values or opioid consumption compared with controls. The use of oral methylnaltrexone after PSFI reduces postoperative constipation, which has implications for reducing hospital length of stay and overall morbidity.
Background: Family-centered care aims to consider family preferences and values in care delivery. Our study examines parent decisions regarding anesthesia type (caudal regional block or local anesthesia) among a diverse sample of children undergoing urologic surgeries. Differences in anesthesia type were examined by known predictors of health disparities, including child race/ethnicity, parental English proficiency, and a proxy for household income. Methods: A retrospective review of 4739 patients (including 25.4% non-Latino/a White, 8.7% non- Latino/a Asians, 7.3% non-Latino/a Black, 23.1% Latino/a, and 35.4% others) undergoing urologic surgeries from 2016 to 2020 using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: 62.1% of Latino/a parents and 60.8% of non-Latino/a Black parents did not agree to a regional block. 65.1% of Spanish-speaking parents with limited English Proficiency did not agree to a regional block. Of parents from households below poverty lines, 61.7% did not agree to a caudal regional block. In regression analysis, Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black youth were less likely to receive caudal regional block than non- Latino/a White patients. Conclusions: We found disparities in the use of pediatric pain management techniques. Understanding mechanisms underlying Latino/a and non- Latino/a Black parental preferences may help providers reduce these disparities.
Background We present a case of COVID-19–positive pediatric patient for urgent urological surgery by spinal anesthesia to avoid aerosolizing procedure. Case presentation A 12-year-old, COVID-19–positive boy presented for urgent wound incision and drainage at the circumcision site. Our anesthetic plan consisted of spinal anesthesia with sedation. He was transported from the COVID-19 isolation floor to the negative pressure operating room. He was placed in lateral decubitus position and oxygen was delivered through facemask. Under sedation, spinal anesthesia was achieved at first attempt. The patient maintained spontaneous ventilation without airway intervention. Patient was recovered in the operation room then transported back to the floor. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative to general endotracheal anesthesia for many pediatric urology procedures. Effective team communication and preparation are keys when caring COVID-19–positive patient in perioperative setting to avoid minimize the risk to healthcare providers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.