2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-006-9000-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collectivist values for learning in organizational relationships in China: the role of trust and vertical coordination

Abstract: Collectivism, Individualism, Vertical coordination, Trust, Learning, Organizational relationships,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…teamwork and alliance partners in China. Indeed, experimental and field studies have found that collectivist, compared to individualistic, values promote cooperative, positive conflict (Tjosvold & Wu, 2005;Tjosvold, Law, & Sun, 2003;Wong & Tjosvold, 2006). Conflict management strengthens genuine harmony and respected, effective leadership.…”
Section: Managing Interest and Emotional Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…teamwork and alliance partners in China. Indeed, experimental and field studies have found that collectivist, compared to individualistic, values promote cooperative, positive conflict (Tjosvold & Wu, 2005;Tjosvold, Law, & Sun, 2003;Wong & Tjosvold, 2006). Conflict management strengthens genuine harmony and respected, effective leadership.…”
Section: Managing Interest and Emotional Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If modernity is related to individualism-collectivism in a U-shaped relationship (Murdock & Provost, 1973;Triandis, 1988), I may propose that the extremely complex society, our globalizing society, may require collectivism (Flynn, 2005;Wong & Tjosvold, 2006). From this perspective, the informal phenomena of social tie, trust, and network form represent the future rather than the past.…”
Section: The Consequence Duality Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the levels of ego-network differ from those of unit analysis. Hence, our focus should be on the issues related to ego-centric network across multiple units of analysis, rather than indirect ties in a high-level system at any level of unit analysis (Li, 1998(Li, , 2006aTang & Xi, 2006;Wong, Tjosvold, & Zhang, 2005;Wong & Tjosvold, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field studies on various types of Chinese teams have shown that Chinese team members tend to be more cooperative than competitive when they engage in cognitive conflicts (Chen et al, 2005). According to these authors, the Chinese culture of collectivism and "social face" concerns, as well as the influential use of implicit communication have been found to facilitate a cooperative, open-minded and productive discussion of opposing views (Wong & Tjosvold, 2006). In other words, the interactions between cognitive conflict and affective conflict may not be the same as that in the West.…”
Section: Cognitive Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%