2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00707.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster analysis of AP-PCR generated DNA fingerprints of Vibrio vulnificus isolates from patients fatally infected after consumption of raw oysters

Abstract: . B E J . 2000. Arbitrarily-primedpolymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) DNA ¢ngerprints were generated for10 Vibrio vulni¢cus strains isolated from patients who became infected and died between1993 and1996 as a result of consuming raw oysters. Analysis of the DNA ¢ngerprints with gel imaging and cluster analysis software revealed signi¢cant genetic heterogeneity among these strains, suggesting that V. vulni¢cus has a high degree of variation in its genomic organization, and that multiple pathogenic strains with g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ribotyping V. vulnificus has demonstrated considerable interstrain genetic heterogeneity and is a useful epidemiological tool but is of limited use in distinguishing virulent from less virulent isolates (1,2,10,21). Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (7,21) and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (2,10,17,25,26) also have generally failed to differentiate virulent from avirulent strains. In one exception, Warner and Oliver (27) applied random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to 70 V. vulnificus strains and reported the presence of a ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ribotyping V. vulnificus has demonstrated considerable interstrain genetic heterogeneity and is a useful epidemiological tool but is of limited use in distinguishing virulent from less virulent isolates (1,2,10,21). Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (7,21) and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (2,10,17,25,26) also have generally failed to differentiate virulent from avirulent strains. In one exception, Warner and Oliver (27) applied random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to 70 V. vulnificus strains and reported the presence of a ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, noted that phenotypic variation is so great for V. vulnificus such that rapid culture-based identification systems are of little value. Genotypic variability has also been demonstrated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, ribotyping, and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (Tamplin et al, 1996;Vickery et al, 2000;Lin et al, 2003). Nonetheless, d-mannitol reaction is predictive of V. vulnificus genotype for about 85% of the time, suggesting its utility in strain characterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others confirmed the great degree of diversity seen with RAPD PCR, noting little correlation between strain source and RAPD pattern (Lin and others 2003). The same can be said for arbitrarily primed (AP)‐PCR (Vickery and others 2000). It is also clear that biotype designations do not always correlate with phylogenies generated by molecular typing methods (Gutacker and others 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%