2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical studies of optimised single crystal and polycrystalline diamonds for radiotherapy dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Poly-C device the sensitivity value was ~6 nC/Gy. This value is consistent with previous reports [9,19] by Descamps et al and Fidanzio et al who found a sensitivity of (2 -3) nC/Gy for polycrystalline diamond samples. Their result is explained to be due to the high defect concentration in polycrystalline material.…”
Section: Signal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For the Poly-C device the sensitivity value was ~6 nC/Gy. This value is consistent with previous reports [9,19] by Descamps et al and Fidanzio et al who found a sensitivity of (2 -3) nC/Gy for polycrystalline diamond samples. Their result is explained to be due to the high defect concentration in polycrystalline material.…”
Section: Signal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This values are in agreement with those reported in literature (0.86 -1.035) for both PTW natural single crystal diamonds and CVD synthetic diamond devices [12,13]. The detector sensitivities were found between 4.03 and 4.28 nC/Gy which are comparable with the values calculated in [14] for polycrystalline diamond detectors. One of the quality parameters of a detector can be estimated by the knowledge of its gain factor G defined as I m /I g where I m is detector current measured and I g the current induced by the radiation field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At ±100 V the leakage current did not exceed 5 pA leading to a minimum bulk resistivity of at least 2.8·10 14 Ωcm. This value is in agreement with others reported in literature for polycrystalline diamond samples [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Most papers on diamond dosimeters are dedicated to commercial natural diamond-based detectors from PTW. Polycrystalline chemical vapor deposition (CVD) diamond [25][26][27][28] and CVD or high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) synthetic single crystal diamond [29][30][31] have been also studied as radiation therapy dosimeters. However, lack of reproducibility, difficulties in controlling impurities incorporation in synthetic crystals, and problems related to encapsulation techniques make the performance of such devices still far from the ones of PTW natural diamond detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%