2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2011.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X-ray detection performance of polycrystalline CVD diamond with pulsed laser deposited carbon electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining these findings with the tunable large dimensions of solution‐grown organic single crystals (see Section ), the achieved net macroscopic effect is a strong increase of the output electrical signal (up to few microamperes) and a notable reduction of the operating bias voltage, down to a few volts (Figure b). The maximum achieved sensitivity of 175 nC Gy −1 is comparable to the one reported for inorganic semiconductor based dosimeters (e.g., 150 nC Gy −1 for silicon) and confirms the potential of OSSC‐based devices for practical applications …”
Section: Organic Semiconducting Single Crystals As Direct Ionizing Rasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…By combining these findings with the tunable large dimensions of solution‐grown organic single crystals (see Section ), the achieved net macroscopic effect is a strong increase of the output electrical signal (up to few microamperes) and a notable reduction of the operating bias voltage, down to a few volts (Figure b). The maximum achieved sensitivity of 175 nC Gy −1 is comparable to the one reported for inorganic semiconductor based dosimeters (e.g., 150 nC Gy −1 for silicon) and confirms the potential of OSSC‐based devices for practical applications …”
Section: Organic Semiconducting Single Crystals As Direct Ionizing Rasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(1) can therefore be expressed as (Laub et al, 1997;Bruzzi et al, 2000;Cirrone et al, 2006) (Planskoy, 1980;Ramkumar et al, 2001;Fidanzio et al, 2004;Laub et al, 1997Laub et al, , 1999Cirrone et al, 2006;Björk et al, 2000;Hoban et al, 1994;Marczewska et al, 2007;Górka et al, 2008;Lansley et al, 2009;Tranchant et al, 2008;Betzel et al, 2010;Schirru et al, 2010;Mohamed Abdel-Rahman et al, 2012) for both natural and synthetic diamonds, and a value of 1.20 has been stated for a silicon diode (Buttar et al, 2000).…”
Section: Dose Rate Dependencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…For each electron and photon beam, Δ values of 0.95±0.02 and 0.96±0.02, respectively were determined for the diamond probe at 1.0 kV/cm illustrating that the Δ value of this particular diamond sensor is not dependent on beam energy and type. In comparison, Δ values between 0.49 and 1.16 have been reported in literature Fidanzio et al, 2004;Cirrone et., 2006;Marczewska et al, 2007;Górka et al, 2008;Lansley et al, 2009;Tranchant et al, 2008;Betzel et al, 2010;Schirru et al, 2010;Mohamed Abdel-Rahman et al, 2012) for other synthetic diamond detectors. The independence of Δ on beam energy and type as established with the diamond probe is advantageous in clinical dosimetry as Δ could be determined only once for any given beam energy and then used for other energies of clinical interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%