2013
DOI: 10.2753/pmr1530-9576360304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizen Participation in the Budget Process and Local Government Accountability

Abstract: Citizen participation in budgeting can be a governmental mechanism to minimize organizational learning pathologies resulting from sole reliance on an administrative accountability model. This study analyzes case studies of Los Angeles and Bukgu, South Korea, to show how participative budgeting combines exploration and refinement strategies to create processes that foster information exchange between citizens and public officials. Although the analysis finds representativeness problems in both cases, scholars, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective administration of local services often relies on data-driven management, compliance with multiple regulations, and in-depth substantive knowledge (Nabatchi, 2010). The professionalized nature of public administration can thus prioritize technocratic expertise to achieve efficient outcomes (Ammons & Rivenbark, 2008;Hatry, 1978;Kim & Schachter, 2013;O'Toole & Stipek, 2002) and supplant values based on community input (Nabatchi, 2010). Further, government officials may have reservations about the ability of ordinary citizens to make decisions with minimal knowledge of substantive or regulatory issues (Heikkila & Isett, 2007), and believe citizens lack the time or level of trust to provide meaningful input (Yang & Callahan, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effective administration of local services often relies on data-driven management, compliance with multiple regulations, and in-depth substantive knowledge (Nabatchi, 2010). The professionalized nature of public administration can thus prioritize technocratic expertise to achieve efficient outcomes (Ammons & Rivenbark, 2008;Hatry, 1978;Kim & Schachter, 2013;O'Toole & Stipek, 2002) and supplant values based on community input (Nabatchi, 2010). Further, government officials may have reservations about the ability of ordinary citizens to make decisions with minimal knowledge of substantive or regulatory issues (Heikkila & Isett, 2007), and believe citizens lack the time or level of trust to provide meaningful input (Yang & Callahan, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, citizen budgeting benefits municipalities by increasing organizational decision-making ability, especially if efforts are intentional and long-term (Kim & Schachter, 2013). Few studies, however, have examined what benefits policymakers perceive in citizen-budgeting processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study demonstrate that the potential of the inhabitants of Polish cities is exploited to a very limited extent. To release this potential constitutes one of the challenges because, as indicated by good practices and other research, participatory management is one of the absolute conditions for ensuring full implementation of the smart city concept (Berntzen & Johannessen, 2016;Bertot, Jaeger, & McClure, 2008;Hudson-Smith, Evans, & Batty, 2005;Kim & Schachter, 2013). Moreover, source literature shows studies identifying factors affecting the construction of the strategy of citizens' involvement in the management process.…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ott and Bronić (2015), "public participation in government fiscal policy and budget processes refers to the variety of ways in which citizens, civil society organisations, businesses and other nonstate actors interact directly with public authorities on issues relating to government taxation and revenue collection, resource allocation, spending and the management of public assets and liabilities". Budget engagement specifically may increase accountability and transparency for public funds, which in turn may improve residents' trust in local government (Kim and Schachter, 2013). In times of austerity or other resource-scarce settings, public participation in local decision-making also proves to be a viable cost-saving strategy (Enshassi and Kullab, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%