2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44687-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chip-Based Reconfigurable Task Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hopefully, the new free areas can accommodate the new incoming task. Compaction requires preemption, where running tasks are stopped and continued at a different location [3]. If all the running tasks are involved in the compaction process, then the compaction is total otherwise it is partial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hopefully, the new free areas can accommodate the new incoming task. Compaction requires preemption, where running tasks are stopped and continued at a different location [3]. If all the running tasks are involved in the compaction process, then the compaction is total otherwise it is partial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithmic challenge in developing a runtime system is to design effective and efficient algorithms for the scheduling and placement of hardware tasks. Such problems have been studied in, e.g., [1,15,8,13,10,3,9] and also under real time constaints in, e.g., [7,14]. Most authors assume a 2-dimensional area model where tasks are modeled as relocatable rectangles which can be placed anywhere on the FPGA device by partial reconfiguration.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means operating on a single frame at a time is much slow er than operating on sev eral contiguous frames in one go, and is one reason w 2 w 1 . U sing the S onic-on-a-C hip platform (system C P U /bus clock speed 1 0 0 M H z , 1 H ow ev er, in both situations a large percentage of the configuration time is d ue to inefficiencies in the d riv er softw are, particularly w here d ata transfer is inv olv ed . Ignoring these inefficiencies one can d eriv e a low er bound to the inherent ov erhead .…”
Section: C O N Fi Gu R a Tio N O V E R H E A Dmentioning
confidence: 99%