2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04027-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of salivary microbiota in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a matched case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norrman et al [84] did not find differences between the groups in number of periodontal pathogens; however, it is important to note that the patients from this study included liver transplant recipients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, using several systemic medications, such as analgesics, immunosuppressors, cyclosporine, and corticosteroid. Omori et al [85] showed no significant differences in the alpha diversity of the salivary microbiota between elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and control groups. At the genus level, however, an increased abundance of Rothia, Faecalibacterium, and Selenomonas was observed, as well as a decreased abundance of Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Neisseria in the diabetic groups compared to the control group.…”
Section: Salivary Microbiome Affected By Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Norrman et al [84] did not find differences between the groups in number of periodontal pathogens; however, it is important to note that the patients from this study included liver transplant recipients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, using several systemic medications, such as analgesics, immunosuppressors, cyclosporine, and corticosteroid. Omori et al [85] showed no significant differences in the alpha diversity of the salivary microbiota between elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and control groups. At the genus level, however, an increased abundance of Rothia, Faecalibacterium, and Selenomonas was observed, as well as a decreased abundance of Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Neisseria in the diabetic groups compared to the control group.…”
Section: Salivary Microbiome Affected By Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This reduction is positively correlated to insulin secretion with fibroblast growth factor concentrations (Zhang et al 2021a , b ). Phylum Firmicutes is abundant in the microbiota of saliva of Japanese patients with T2DM (Omori et al 2022 ). The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio is associated with a normal intestinal homeostasis and increased ratio of this is observed with obesity while decreased ratio are seen with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Stojanov et al 2020 ), and it is not a good news as per Clostridia , which is a causative bacteria of potentially deadly diseases like botulism and tetanus (Cruz-Morales et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Gut Bacteriome Alterations and Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, increasing knowledge of the microbiota has revealed that it plays a symbiotic role in maintaining the physiological functions of the host. Oral microbiota is closely associated with various systemic diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, suggesting that the salivary microbiota may be a disease-specific biomarker [10][11][12][13] . Although individual oral bacterial species associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction have been identified 14,15) , no association between the salivary microbiota as a whole and vascular endothelial function has yet been identified.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral sample collection and examination were performed as previously described 12) . Briefly, saliva samples were collected from participants in the morning (at least 2 h after brushing their teeth or consumption of meals) using the cotton swab method, as previously described 22) , using the saliva collection system SalivaBio Ⓡ oral swab and swab storage tube (Salimetrics, Irvine, PA, USA) prior to the oral examination.…”
Section: Oral Sample Collection and Oral Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%