1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.706357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of AP bias in spin valve memory elements

Abstract: Spin valve memory element biased with a pair of antiparallel (AP) coupled ferromagnetic layer was analyzed and modeled via micromagnetic simulation. In an AP structure, an external field results in a torque, causing the antiparallel magnetization (AP) axis to rotate towards the direction orthogonal to the field. In addition, due to its strength difference between the two AP layers, the magnetostatic field from the free layer of the spin valve can lead to irreversible AP axis flipping. This irreversible flippin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small shift of the Fraunhofer pattern, on the other hand, indicates that only the F' layers are magnetized in the direction of H app . This scenario is perfectly plausible in the light of the "spin-flop" transition of the SAF [16,17]. To identify the magnetic structure responsible for the enhancement of the spin-triplet supercurrent, we made a large-area sample of the form Si/Nb(150 nm)/Cu(10 nm)/Co(6 nm)/Ru(0.6nm)/Co(6nm)/Cu(10 nm), which has the Josephson junction layer structure shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small shift of the Fraunhofer pattern, on the other hand, indicates that only the F' layers are magnetized in the direction of H app . This scenario is perfectly plausible in the light of the "spin-flop" transition of the SAF [16,17]. To identify the magnetic structure responsible for the enhancement of the spin-triplet supercurrent, we made a large-area sample of the form Si/Nb(150 nm)/Cu(10 nm)/Co(6 nm)/Ru(0.6nm)/Co(6nm)/Cu(10 nm), which has the Josephson junction layer structure shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This SAF "spin-flop" transition was predicted and first demonstrated over a decade ago. [16,17] Our sample geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low fields, the hard axis saturation process is the minimum energy magnetic saturation process, and there is a torque on the particles to align the hard axis to the applied field. 15,16 At high fields, the easy axis saturated state is the lower energy magnetic configuration. The global energy minimum saturation process shown by the black curves in Figures 2(a) and 2(b) reflects this and explains the two different chaining configurations shown in Figures 1(e) and 1(f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The explanation is that the F' and F" layers are magnetized parallel to the field, while the SAF undergoes a "spinflop" transition whereby the two Co layers end up with their magnetization perpendicular to the direction of the applied field. 17,18 According to theory, [19][20][21][22] this configuration with perpendicular magnetizations maximizes the magnitude of the spin-triplet supercurrent. If angles θ1 and θ2 have the same sign (where we constrain |θ1|, |θ2| < π), the junction will have π coupling; if they have opposite signs, the junction will have 0 coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%