2015
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n2p917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características nutricionais e perdas no processo fermentativo de silagens de milho, colhidas em diferentes estádios reprodutivos com diferentes processamentos de grãos

Abstract: ResumoO experimento foi conduzido no Núcleo de Produção Animal (NUPRAN) da Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da colheita da planta de milho em diferentes estádios reprodutivos e com diferentes processamentos de grãos sobre as perdas e o valor nutritivo das silagens. Diferenças (P<0,05) foram evidenciadas para o quesito estádio reprodutivo, quanto aos teores de matéria seca (26,70% contra 34,78%), matéria mineral (4,35% contra 3,87%), fibra em detergente ácido… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the increase in grain participation obtained in the present study and reported by other authors is considered by Mendes, Gabriel, Faria, Rossi and Possatto (2015) as desirable, since they give higher energy value to the silage produced (Marafon et al, 2015), but it is noteworthy that one should not only consider this parameter to characterize the harvesting time as appropriate or not for silage production. Table 3 lists the chemical composition of the whole plant and the grain-free plant harvested at different maturity stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the increase in grain participation obtained in the present study and reported by other authors is considered by Mendes, Gabriel, Faria, Rossi and Possatto (2015) as desirable, since they give higher energy value to the silage produced (Marafon et al, 2015), but it is noteworthy that one should not only consider this parameter to characterize the harvesting time as appropriate or not for silage production. Table 3 lists the chemical composition of the whole plant and the grain-free plant harvested at different maturity stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…For the whole plant RFV, higher values were obtained at R4, R5 and R6 stages, which did not differ (P> 0.05), whereas the grain-free plant presented a decreasing linear behavior with advancing maturity stages. Marafon et al (2015) attributed the increase in RFV at advanced maturity stages to higher concentration of grains. Buso et al (2018) used the same argument to explain the increase in non-fiber carbohydrate concentration at these stages; according to these authors, grain is a starch-rich and lowfiber component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ensiled crops, before the ideal point, besides presenting lower total mass production, have a higher NDF content due to the occurrence of effluent and the lower share of the grain fraction in the mass ( VAN SOEST, 1994;VILELA et al 2008). Similarly, Marafon et al (2015), evaluating different maize harvesting stages, observed that maize plants in the R5 stage presented lower FDN and FDA content, when compared to the R3 stage due to the dilution of these fractions, by the transformation of simple sugars into starch in the grain component. Also, VAN SOEST et al, (1991), points out that good silage must comply with some minimum quality criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Still, there is a large number of maize hybrids destined for silage production, from which significant differences with respect to the production of Green forester, production of grains, leaves and stalk directly interfering with the nutritional value of the silage (MORAES et al, 2013). In this sense, the choice of hybrid and reproductive stage of cutting becomes determinant factors for the success of the system, since the hybrid may represent up to 50% of the final yield (FACTORI et al, 2012), and the stage of cutting that the plant is in, is directly related to the available energy of this material, by increasing the participation of grains (MARAFON et al, 2015). In this context, it is important studies, which demonstrate the best strategy for harvesting these hybrids, which provide higher milk production ha-1 and economic income for the rural producer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%