2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622009000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características fisiológicas e crescimento de clones de eucalipto em resposta ao boro

Abstract: RESUMO -A exigência para boro (B) varia largamente entre e dentro das espécies vegetais. Objetivando avaliar a resposta de clones de eucalipto ao B em solução nutritiva foi realizado ensaio em casa de vegetação com oito clones. As plantas cresceram em soluções nutritivas com 0, 10, 20, 50 e 100 µmol/L de B, durante 70 dias. Na finalização do ensaio determinaram-se características fisiológicas, produção de matéria seca e teores de B no tecido vegetal. Houve resposta diferenciada dos clones à concentração de B n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
10
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil had the following characteristics: 1.4 % organic matter; 42.0 % clay; 1.1 mg. ) was made together to the drip irrigation (MATTIELLO et al, 2009b). On the other days, irrigation with ultrapure water only was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil had the following characteristics: 1.4 % organic matter; 42.0 % clay; 1.1 mg. ) was made together to the drip irrigation (MATTIELLO et al, 2009b). On the other days, irrigation with ultrapure water only was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La adaptación a las situaciones de deficiencia de B será diferente dependiendo del clon utilizado (MATTIELLO et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This indicates that C i is fixed, increasing photosynthetic rates, resulting in higher biomass. The average value of 0.8 was also seen by Mattiello et al (2009) with different clones of Eucalyptus in nutrient solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%