2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities supporting digital servitization: A multi-actor perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital transformation has promoted the transformation of business model and realized the deep integration of digitalization and servitization ( Favoretto et al, 2022 ). Using relationships to look at the relationship between prospective suppliers and customers ( Kamalaldin et al, 2020 ), and redefine the capabilities of service-oriented participants in the context of digital transformation ( Marcon et al, 2022 ). The above literature describes the impact of digital transformation on various aspects of enterprises, but there are few literatures on the driving factors of digital transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital transformation has promoted the transformation of business model and realized the deep integration of digitalization and servitization ( Favoretto et al, 2022 ). Using relationships to look at the relationship between prospective suppliers and customers ( Kamalaldin et al, 2020 ), and redefine the capabilities of service-oriented participants in the context of digital transformation ( Marcon et al, 2022 ). The above literature describes the impact of digital transformation on various aspects of enterprises, but there are few literatures on the driving factors of digital transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2014; Müller et al. , 2021; Marcon et al. , 2022), a priori evaluations and planning are necessary to overcome the unprofitable period that reflects the “service paradox” and achieve the combination of excellence-driven servitisation and technology endowment that will benefit the SME (Brax et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to reduce the failure risk we recommend verifying in advance that the firm has the resources and capabilities needed to successfully redefine internal and external processes and, if necessary, the relations within the value chain. Since both servitisation and Industry 4.0 are resource-and skill-demanding processes (Zhang et al, 2022;Brax, 2005;Mourtzis et al, 2014;M€ uller et al, 2021;Marcon et al, 2022), a priori evaluations and planning are necessary to overcome the unprofitable period that reflects the "service paradox" and achieve the combination of excellence-driven servitisation and technology endowment that will benefit the SME (Brax et al, 2021;Kowalkowski et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product–service system provisions are often characterized by value creation networks (Gebauer et al 2010 ; Marcon et al 2022 ; Oliva and Kallenberg 2003 ), meaning that apart from the equipment manufacturer, the customers whose products are to be serviced must be integrated into the service delivery process. Often, component manufacturers, system integrators, and third-party service providers are also involved (Marcon et al 2022 ). Therefore, efficient service delivery depends on the network participants’ ability to diffuse information and knowledge to achieve collaborative troubleshooting (Oliva and Kallenberg 2003 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, equipment manufacturers bundle their capital equipment products (e.g., machine tools, material handling systems, and valve technology) with maintenance services directed to their installed base (e.g., equipment installation, fault diagnosis, repair, overhaul, and application engineering optimization) to provide value to their customers, build revenue, and achieve profitability growth (Oliva and Kallenberg 2003 ; Wise and Baumgartner 1999 ). The key quality requirements for such product–service systems are accessibility, locality, and responsiveness of services—i.e., customers expect very short response times to equipment failures (Biehl et al 2004 ; Marcon et al 2022 ; Toossi et al 2013 ). This especially holds true for failures causing downtime in equipment as their unavailability creates huge opportunity costs for customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%