Can individualism/collectivism paradigm explain disparate roles for intermediaries in an organizational justice model of police compliance with agency rules?

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines whether dissimilarities in societal cultures impact the path by which a key component of organizational culture—supervisory procedural justice (SPJ)—influences police officer compliance with police agency rules.Design/methodology/approachThe study utilized structural equation modeling across a data set of 1,189 Croatian and Taiwan police officers to test whether a societal value (individualism/collectivism) impacts the role of three intermediary variables (trust in the public, job satisfaction and pro-organization initiative) in a procedural justice model of officer compliance with the rules.FindingsThe study found that, despite a strong statistical similarity in the individual attitudes of Croatian and Taiwan police officers, the intermediary variables in the model significantly differed between the two countries. Most notably, the role of trust in the public and pro-organization initiative supported past research suggesting that collectivist versus individualistic societal cultures lead to divergent organizational attitudes and policing outcomes.Originality/valueThis is the first empirical study to compare the impact of societal values on a model of SPJ on officer compliance with agency rules.

Guest editorial: Reexamining the police culture

“…The role of the society at large on shaping police officers’ attitudes is further explored in the study by Peacock et al (2023b). Selecting Croatia and Taiwan, two countries whose cultures are characterized with different individualism/collectivism social values—Croatia and Taiwan, Peacock et al (2023b) analyze the effect of these differential value systems on police officer compliance with police agency rules. In sync with other studies emphasizing the link between supervisory procedural justice and police officers’ willingness to adhere to the official agency rules (e.g.…”

“…Cochran and Worden, 2023; Hacin and Meško, 2022; Nam, 2023; Orosco and Gaub, 2023; Paoline and Gau, 2023; Patterson and King, 2023; Peacock et al ., 2023a; Wu et al ., 2023), and that external environments matter as well (e.g. Amagnya, 2023; Peacock et al ., 2023b; Wu, 2023; Wu et al ., 2023). These papers reaffirm some previously established notions—that the police culture could vary across police agencies, units and assignments (e.g.…”