2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?

Abstract: The perspectives of regenerative medicine are still severely hampered by the host response to biomaterial implantation, despite the robustness of technologies that hold the promise to recover the functionality of damaged organs and tissues. In this scenario, the cellular and molecular events that decide on implant success and tissue regeneration are played at the interface between the foreign body and the host inflammation, determined by innate and adaptive immune responses. To avoid adverse events, rather tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
406
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 392 publications
(441 reference statements)
3
406
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In seemingly all applied cases, it is important to minimize any immune response to the hydrogel injection. Immunological responses are responsible for adverse outcomes of biomaterial injection or implantation, including inflammation and fibrosis 52 . While these responses are deleterious in their own right, their associated physicochemical shifts (i.e., changes in the local pH or temperature) can also alter the hydrogel material, impairing function further.…”
Section: Design Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seemingly all applied cases, it is important to minimize any immune response to the hydrogel injection. Immunological responses are responsible for adverse outcomes of biomaterial injection or implantation, including inflammation and fibrosis 52 . While these responses are deleterious in their own right, their associated physicochemical shifts (i.e., changes in the local pH or temperature) can also alter the hydrogel material, impairing function further.…”
Section: Design Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of cells with the implants takes place at the sub-micrometer level. Some studies prove that the anisotropic structure considerably improves the integration of the bone [12,13]. Micrographs of the coating show a rough and porous topography that is formed by the accumulation of coarse incompletely melted Ti powder particles.…”
Section: Results Of Coatings Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important finding in this study was the formation of granulomas in the membrane group. Mariani et al 27 suggested that this foreign body reaction represents chronic inflammation comprised mainly of multinucleated giant cells and can occur in response to the implantation of a biomaterial. However, it cannot be concluded that the granulomas observed in this study were produced due to membrane features or immunological responses in recipient animals since they were not detected in the membrane groups at days 7 and 14.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%