2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044006337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beneficial effects of a skin tolerance‐tested moisturizing cream on the barrier function in experimentally‐elicited irritant and allergic contact dermatitis

Abstract: In experimentally-induced irritant (ICD) and allergic (ACD) contact dermatitis, an oil-in-water (o/w) cream was applied to investigate its effects on a disturbed barrier function compared to untreated physiological barrier repair. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements were performed. Before the start of the experiments, the skin tolerance of the cream was examined, revealing the non-irritating characteristics of the ingredients and the absence of any contact allergic patch test reaction. In the ICD stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All effects in the tewameter measurements of extract preparations were less pronounced compared to pure base cream DAC and some preparations even led to higher TEWL than pure base cream. This may be explained by the fact that emollients per se have a strong effect on barrier function repair in diseased skin as well as in experimentally induced ICD like in the present study [15][16][17] . Another reason for the strong effect of emollients alone regardless of the content of extracts may be that parts of the cream may remain on the test fi eld and lead to a physical barrier, resulting in a diminished SLS penetration into the epidermis and therefore less pronounced barrier disruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All effects in the tewameter measurements of extract preparations were less pronounced compared to pure base cream DAC and some preparations even led to higher TEWL than pure base cream. This may be explained by the fact that emollients per se have a strong effect on barrier function repair in diseased skin as well as in experimentally induced ICD like in the present study [15][16][17] . Another reason for the strong effect of emollients alone regardless of the content of extracts may be that parts of the cream may remain on the test fi eld and lead to a physical barrier, resulting in a diminished SLS penetration into the epidermis and therefore less pronounced barrier disruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As it has already been shown in other studies, the protective effect of some emulsions cannot only be based on a zur Mühlen/Klotz/Weimans/Veeger/ Thörner/Diener/Hermann physical effect [15,16]. From these observations, the important question arises as to how the protective effect of the multiple emulsion is achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…By contrast to Wang et al [64], some authors suggest that BCs should only be used for exposure to mild irritants (water, detergents, organic solvents or cutting oils) because they cannot neutralize a high dose of irritant [13,61]. Indeed, after saturation, the agents sequestered in the layer of cream continue to penetrate the skin [18,28] if the substances are not inactivated by BCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, after saturation, the agents sequestered in the layer of cream continue to penetrate the skin [18,28] if the substances are not inactivated by BCs. This explains the potential of some BCs to induce contact dermatitis [4] and to increase the skin's susceptibility to irritants [61]. As may be seen in table 3, protection against toluene is very low and must be improved in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation