Although skin protective products to prevent irritant skin reactions are in wide use, neither standardized test models to prove differences in efficacy exist, nor has the quality or the reproducibility of results been evaluated in a multicentre approach. This should be mandatory when developing or testing skin care products. Therefore, we have designed a multicentre study in an approach to find a standardized test procedure for the evaluation of skin protective products. In this irritation study, a repeated short-time occlusive irritation test (ROIT) with a standardized protocol has been evaluated in 2 phases (12 days and 5 days protocol) in 4 (n=20) respectively 6 (n=33) skilled centres. The skin reaction was induced by 2 irritants (0.5% aq. SLS and toluene, 2x a day for 30 min). Its modification by 3 different cream bases with different hydrophilicity was analyzed. The irritation was monitored by bioengineering methods (TEWL measurement, colorimetry) and by clinical scoring. The evaluation showed that significant results could already be achieved with the 5-day protocol. Furthermore, in spite of the expected inter-centre variations due to heterogeneity of the individual threshold of irritation, interpretation of clinical score, and inter-instrumental variability, the ranking of the vehicles regarding reduction of the irritant reaction was consistent in all centres.

The effect of a protective cream was tested in a new tandem repeated irritation test with tandem application of 0.5% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) and undiluted toluene. The irritants were applied twice daily for 30 min to the ventral forearms of 20 volunteers. Irritant cutaneous reactions were quantified by a visual score, transepidermal water loss, chromametry and skin capacitance. Concurrent application of SLS/toluene induced stronger reactions than those caused by twice daily application of each irritant on its own. A protective effect of the protective cream was obtained against all treatment combinations and was significant for SLS/SLS (p < or = 0.01) and SLS/ toluene (p < or = 0.05). Our results indicate that the tandem repetitive irritation test has great potential in the evaluation of skin care products to prevent irritant contact dermatitis.

Skin-protection products are used in the occupational field to protect the skin against hazards from the workplace. They are only to be used for non-toxic, non-cancerogenous and non-sensitizing low-grade irritants such as water, detergents, and cutting fluids and cannot replace other protective measures such as gloves. The recommendation of products mainly focuses on the physico-chemical properties of the irritant and the protective cream. More in vivo studies and intervention studies are needed to prove the efficacy of skin-protection products under real-life conditions.

Background: There is a basic necessity to understand the mechanisms of the protective effects of emulsions. This would promote the development of protective cosmetics and therefore improve the prevention and treatment of occupational skin diseases. However, for such studies, no reliable skin model is available. Objective: An in vitro skin model test was developed to evaluate the protective mechanism of cosmetic ingredients. Methods: The efficacy of three products was assessed by an in vivo test (Repetitive Occlusive Irritation Test) and then 3-dimensional skin model tests were carried out. Results: In vivo test results demonstrate that the best protection against sodium dodecyl sulphate is offered by a multiple emulsion. In the case of a skin model test, sodium dodecyl sulphate led to cell damage, an increase in pro-inflammatory markers and some barrier lipids. The multiple emulsion increased the content of skin lipids, without inducing irritation or cell death. Conclusion: Skin models react similarly to sodium dodecyl sulphate compared to human skin and therefore they are suitable to study barrier repair after sodium dodecyl sulphate damage. It is likely that the superior protective effect of the multiple emulsion in vivo is based on the increased amount of skin barrier lipids.

The worker must be able to choose the skin cleanser that is adequate for the contamination that is present. Therefore, information and education of the workers are crucial for skin-compatible skin cleansing.