2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of flock-level sensitivity of detection of Salmonella spp., Enteritidis and Typhimurium according to the sampling procedure in French laying-hen houses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Houses with a scraper system and step-cages represent two thirds of all cage systems in the United Kingdom, similar to other EU countries (R. Davies, unpublished data). Therefore it is not surprising that a higher prevalence of SE in cage houses has also been reported in studies throughout the EU [27][28][29]. However, in one study the opposite was found where hens within flocks were of different ages [30], which would be expected in multi-age flocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Houses with a scraper system and step-cages represent two thirds of all cage systems in the United Kingdom, similar to other EU countries (R. Davies, unpublished data). Therefore it is not surprising that a higher prevalence of SE in cage houses has also been reported in studies throughout the EU [27][28][29]. However, in one study the opposite was found where hens within flocks were of different ages [30], which would be expected in multi-age flocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Animals and their products, particularly chicken, meat and eggs, are considered to be major sources of human infections caused by this pathogen [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stage of infection may also condition the results since dust is likely to test negative in the very early stages of infection (Davies and Breslin 2001;Davies and Breslin 2004;EC 2004;EFSA 2007). Also the efficiency of dust sampling appears to depend on the type of house sampled, and it is suggested that it is more efficient in cage houses (Mahe et al 2008;Huneau-Salaun et al 2009). A plausible explanation for this is that in non-cage houses sufficient amounts of settled dust may not always be available for sampling, and this may compromise the efficiency of dust testing (Davies 2005).…”
Section: What To Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in France analysing EU layer survey data suggested a lower prevalence of positive environmental samples from flocks kept in non-cage houses (Mahe et al 2008). In the UK there is some evidence of a higher within-flock prevalence in non-cage flocks (Arnold et al 2009a).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Detection Of Salmonella Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation