1996
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199603000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Assay of Contact Lens Wearers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 This is in agreement with another study that measured 17–64 cfu per conjunctival swab in 10% of the swabs, 5–16 cfu/swab in 15 % of the swabs, and as few as 0–4 cfu/swab in 75% of the swabs, illustrating the measurable but infrequent bacterial presence in the conjunctival tissues. 16 In contrast, lid swabs yielded a high number of cfu: 101–1000 cfu/swab in 3% of the cases, 11–100 cfu/swab in 38% of the swabs, and finally 0–10 cfu/swab in 59% of the swabs. 17 Cumulatively, these experiments demonstrated that there is a limited abundance of the in vitro sustainable microbial species at the ocular surfaces, including the lid margin areas, which is remarkably different from what is present in the oral mucosa or saliva.18–21 Consistently, 100% of the swabs taken from the oral mucosa and saliva yielded bacterial presence and contained 10 7 –10 8 cfu/ml of sustainable bacterial sp.…”
Section: Is There a Core Ocular Commensal Microbiota?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…15 This is in agreement with another study that measured 17–64 cfu per conjunctival swab in 10% of the swabs, 5–16 cfu/swab in 15 % of the swabs, and as few as 0–4 cfu/swab in 75% of the swabs, illustrating the measurable but infrequent bacterial presence in the conjunctival tissues. 16 In contrast, lid swabs yielded a high number of cfu: 101–1000 cfu/swab in 3% of the cases, 11–100 cfu/swab in 38% of the swabs, and finally 0–10 cfu/swab in 59% of the swabs. 17 Cumulatively, these experiments demonstrated that there is a limited abundance of the in vitro sustainable microbial species at the ocular surfaces, including the lid margin areas, which is remarkably different from what is present in the oral mucosa or saliva.18–21 Consistently, 100% of the swabs taken from the oral mucosa and saliva yielded bacterial presence and contained 10 7 –10 8 cfu/ml of sustainable bacterial sp.…”
Section: Is There a Core Ocular Commensal Microbiota?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are multiple possibilities that explain these relationships. The conjunctiva or lid may serve as the source of contamination to the lens, Hart et al [11], Wilcox et al [12]. Contact lens wear may disrupt the ecology of the ocular surface by altering the balance of the normal micro biota.…”
Section: Organismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1218 To date, microorganisms that colonize lid margins13, 17, hands14, 16, lens cases12, 18, and the domestic water supply17 have been implicated as such sources. Furthermore, other studies have looked for associations between lens contamination and physical lens properties or patient factors 1924.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%