2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Microbiome on Ocular Health

Abstract: The ocular surface is continuously exposed to the environment and, therefore, it is surprising that it harbors only few commensals with low degree of diversity. This unique aspect of the ocular surface physiology prompts the question whether there are core ocular commensal communities and how they affect ocular immunity. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of what is known about the ocular surface commensals in health and disease and what we would like to learn in the near future. In addition,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
118
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, whereas human saliva yields 10 6 −10 8 CFUs/mL 90 , human tear fluid yields as low as 10 2 −10 3 CFUs/mL 91 . Furthermore, Gadjeva pointed out that other work using 16S rRNA sequencing does not indicate whether these data represent live bacterial colonization or instead transiently existing live or dead bacteria 89 .…”
Section: Eye Immune Privilege Breach and The Mpsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, whereas human saliva yields 10 6 −10 8 CFUs/mL 90 , human tear fluid yields as low as 10 2 −10 3 CFUs/mL 91 . Furthermore, Gadjeva pointed out that other work using 16S rRNA sequencing does not indicate whether these data represent live bacterial colonization or instead transiently existing live or dead bacteria 89 .…”
Section: Eye Immune Privilege Breach and The Mpsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, for reasons not understood, the surface of the normal eye has an extraordinarily low density and diversity of commensal bacteria, which is dissimilar to any other barrier site (reviewed in Ref 89 ). For example, whereas human saliva yields 10 6 −10 8 CFUs/mL 90 , human tear fluid yields as low as 10 2 −10 3 CFUs/mL 91 .…”
Section: Eye Immune Privilege Breach and The Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ocular infections are not as common as could be expected from this permanent exposure. In fact, ocular pathogens in order to succeed have to compete with the endogenous bacterial strains of the ocular surface [33], and escape from the defense proteins present in the tear film [34]. The main proteins of this class that are synthesized by cells residing in the eye are Lf, lysozyme, immunoglobulin-A and tear lipocalins [34].…”
Section: The Role Of Lactoferrin In the Tear Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of the eye is continuously exposed to the environment along with a vast array of organisms (bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protozoa) that inhabit such environs. However, despite the exposure, the ocular surface yields a low positive bacterial culture . Reports from canine conjunctival cultures on healthy eyes are negative 39% to 78% of the time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common Gram‐negative isolates include Neisseria spp., Moraxella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli . Regardless, the vast majority of existing microbial species have never been grown in the laboratory despite an ample variety of agars, media, and culture techniques and conditions . Ex vivo culture of an organism, to identify it and determine antimicrobial susceptibility, is thus inherently limited by the range of organisms that will actively grow in laboratory culture conditions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%