2007 IEEE Sensors 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icsens.2007.4388387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Low Power Microsystem Powered by Vibration Energy Harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The office air conditioning unit has resonant peaks between 40 and 50 Hz with acceleration levels between 0.85 and 1.7 m s −2 . The vibration spectrum measurements for the air compressor are consistent with that of the air conditioning unit [7]. The generator and sensor system have therefore been designed to work initially with these applications and at low acceleration 0957-0233/08/125202+08$30.00 1 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The office air conditioning unit has resonant peaks between 40 and 50 Hz with acceleration levels between 0.85 and 1.7 m s −2 . The vibration spectrum measurements for the air compressor are consistent with that of the air conditioning unit [7]. The generator and sensor system have therefore been designed to work initially with these applications and at low acceleration 0957-0233/08/125202+08$30.00 1 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Connection to a voltage multiplier circuit and supercapacitor for energy storage results in a reduction in peak power to 37 μW but the useable bandwidth increases to over 1 Hz (see figure 5). This is due to the in increased damping arising from the improved coupling provided by a capacitive load [25]. This increased damping means the generator can be driven up to an acceleration level of 1.7 ms -2 before reaching z max at which point the power output is 120 μWrms.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the [14]. However, in the original design these two parts are optimised separately, which is quite common in existing energy harvester design approaches.…”
Section: A Performance Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%