2015
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment Change in the Beginning Stages of Therapy: Examining Change Trajectories for Avoidance and Anxiety

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of self-reported attachment change (avoidance and anxiety) in the context of six sessions of couple therapy designed to emphasize both therapist-centered and couple-centered (i.e., enactment-based) clinical process during the beginning stages of therapy. A total of 48 couples with at least one partner who reported clinically significant relationship dissatisfaction participated in this study. Findings confirmed that some couples experience positive attach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we introduced a new method (PRRSA) to explore changes in attachment within clients. PRRSA allows us to use changes in the attachment as predictors, whereas HLM or growth curve analysis focuses on changes in attachment as an outcome variable predicted by other variables (e.g., Sauer et al, 2010) or on overall change trajectory through the entire therapy (e.g., Seedall et al, 2016). Also, different from cross-lagged panel analysis (e.g., Murphy et al, 2016), only examining how the influence of the level of attachment insecurity at a time-point (T) predicted the level of the outcome at the following time-point (T + 1), PRRSA could investigate the immediate influence of consistency and change in a time period (between T and T + 1) on the outcome (T + 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we introduced a new method (PRRSA) to explore changes in attachment within clients. PRRSA allows us to use changes in the attachment as predictors, whereas HLM or growth curve analysis focuses on changes in attachment as an outcome variable predicted by other variables (e.g., Sauer et al, 2010) or on overall change trajectory through the entire therapy (e.g., Seedall et al, 2016). Also, different from cross-lagged panel analysis (e.g., Murphy et al, 2016), only examining how the influence of the level of attachment insecurity at a time-point (T) predicted the level of the outcome at the following time-point (T + 1), PRRSA could investigate the immediate influence of consistency and change in a time period (between T and T + 1) on the outcome (T + 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, growth mixture models have identified unique subgroups of people that change differently from one another across time in parenting stress (Chang & Fine, 2007), relationship adjustment (Foran, Hahlweg, Kliem, & O'Leary, 2013), and depressive symptoms (Updegraff, Perez-Brena, Umaña-Taylor, Jahromi, & Harvey-Mendoza, 2013). Change in outcomes over the course of therapy also can happen differently for subgroups of people, for example, attachment may change differently for partners throughout therapy (Seedall, Butler, Zamora, & Yang, 2016). Any experienced clinician recognizes that clients change in unique ways from one another.…”
Section: Growth Mixture Modeling To Assess Differences In Change Acromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those n = 67, only n = 20 had employed a type of analysis capable of analyzing growth (i.e., latent growth curve, multilevel modeling, hierarchical linear modeling, latent transition analysis, or growth mixture modeling; contact the corresponding author for the full list of articles). In the past 12 years, only one manuscript published in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy has employed GMM (i.e., Seedall, Butler, Zamora, & Yang, 2016). In fact, it is the only manuscript in the history of the journal to employ this particular analysis.…”
Section: Growth Mixture Modeling To Assess Differences In Change Acromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analiz bulguları beraber değerlendirildiğinde güvenli bağlanma örüntüsüne sahip eşler, evlilik ilişkilerinde duygu ve düşüncelerini karşı tarafa rahatça ifade edip, verdikleri tepkiler olumsuz olsa dahi karşı tarafın her zaman olumsuz tepki vermeyeceğini, eşlerinin farklı tepkiler verebileceğini düşünmektedir. Güvenli bağlanan bireylerin, eşlerinden düşmanca tepkiler beklemedikleri için de, kaygı hissetmeyip, ilişki döngüsünü kesmeyerek, eşleri ile yakın ilişkiyi sürdürüp, evliliklerinden daha çok doyum alabildikleri düşünülmektedir (Knapp et al 2015;Seedall et al 2015). Bununla ilişkili olarak, duygu ve düşüncelerini karşı tarafa daha rahat dile getirebildikleri için de çatışmaları karşılıklı uzlaşı sağlayarak çözebildikleri belirtilmektedir (Tulum 2014;Karagöz-Okutan 2016).…”
Section: Fig 1 Modelunclassified