We examined the effects of deliberate practice training focused on immediacy (Im) for 7 doctoral student trainees. Training included an 8-hr workshop, 4 individual 50-min sessions, and 4 individual 30-min homework sessions. Qualitative results indicated that trainees found the deliberate practice training to be effective, especially in helping them become aware of and manage emotions and countertransference, which had inhibited them from using Im. In addition, there was a moderate and significant effect of training on the trainee's self-efficacy for using Im, a small and significant effect on therapist-rated working alliance, and no significant effect for client-rated working alliance. Clinical Impact StatementDeliberate practice (DP) has been encouraged for helping therapists develop expertise, but empirical evidence about its effectiveness is lacking. Question: Can DP help therapy trainees develop self-efficacy for using immediacy and improve the working alliance? Findings: DP helped therapists develop self-efficacy for talking with clients about the therapy relationship. Identifying and learning to manage personal reactions to clients, being given specific ideas of how to handle situations differently, and practicing immediacy were cited as helpful components of DP training. Meaning: DP can be a helpful addition to regular supervision. Next Steps: More research is needed with other trainers, therapists, and interventions.

We investigated the antecedents, occurrences, and consequences of 183 silence events in the first 5 and last 5 sessions of a 73-session case of successful psychodynamic psychotherapy. Silences generally occurred within client speaking turns, such that the client often paused to reflect while speaking. In the last 5 sessions, as compared with the first 5 sessions, the client was more collaborative before and after silences, silences were shorter, the therapist was more connectional during silences (e.g., shared emotion and meaning with client), and the client was more emotional after silences. Antecedent client collaboration, duration of the silence, therapist behavior during silence events, client behavior during silence events, and who broke the silence all related to change in collaboration from before to after the silence events. We concluded that silence was helpful in this case because of client factors (the client naturally paused a lot during discussion, the client was quite reflective and insightful), therapist factors (the therapist was comfortable with and believed in silence), and relationship factors (there was a strong therapeutic relationship).

Using multilevel polynomial regression and response surface analysis, we studied the association between Time 1 (T) and Time 2 (T + 1) attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, and T + 1 psychological distress in 253 nine-session time periods for 65 adult community clients working with 13 doctoral student therapists in open-ended psychodynamic psychotherapy. Results indicated that when client attachment anxiety was consistent and higher from the beginning (T) to the end (T + 1) of a nine-session time period, clients tended to report higher distress at the end of the period; when attachment anxiety was consistent and lower across a time period, clients tended to report lower distress. When attachment anxiety decreased across a time period, clients reported lower distress at the end of the period; when attachment anxiety increased across a time period, clients reported higher distress. Neither within-client consistency nor change in attachment avoidance in a time period was significantly related to client distress at the end of the period. Limitations and implications of the present research are discussed. Public Significance StatementWhen client's attachment anxiety diminishes or remains low across nine sessions, they subsequently report being less psychologically distressed. Hence, therapists need to be particularly aware of times when clients are anxiously attached and help them reduce the attachment anxiety or help them maintain low levels of attachment anxiety.

The authors examined how stability/change in working alliance predicted subsequent symptoms, and how stability/change in symptoms predicted subsequent alliance in a sample of 188 adult clients with 44 doctoral student therapists over the course of 893 eight-session time periods of individual psychodynamic psychotherapy. Clients completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR; Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006) after every session and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ;Lambert et al., 1996) before intake and every eighth session. The authors used multilevel polynomial regression and response surface analyses to examine within-client effects. The authors found that change in the alliance across an eightsession period did not have an immediate temporal effect on symptoms, but when alliance was stable and stronger compared to other periods, subsequent symptoms were lower. Similarly, change in symptoms across an eight-session period did not have an immediate temporal effect on alliance, but when symptoms were stable and lower compared to other periods, subsequent alliance was stronger. These results suggest that sustained improvements in the alliance contribute to subsequent symptom improvements, and vice versa. The authors conclude that it is important to work to improve and maintain improvements in the working alliance and symptoms. Limitations and future directions are discussed. Public Significance StatementOur study found that clients tended to report lower symptoms after sustained improvements in the working alliance, rather than immediately after alliance growth. Similarly, clients tended to report stronger working alliance after sustained improvements in symptoms, rather than immediately after symptom reduction. Therefore, therapists should work to improve and maintain improvements in the working alliance and symptoms given their reciprocal effect on each other.

No abstract