The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43076-021-00091-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Dysfunctional Grief due to Death from COVID-19 in Peru: Adaptation and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Pandemic Grief Scale

Abstract: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS), using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods, in a sample of 458 people who have suffered the loss of a loved one due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Pandemic Grief Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), the two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-2), and a single item on suicidal ideation were used. The unidimensional model had good fit and reliability; furthermore, convergent validit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous evidence, a five-factor structure is expected to present an adequate fit and show evidence of reliability ( Taylor et al, 2020e ; Abbady et al, 2021 ; Khosravani et al, 2021 ). Similarly, it would be expected that, based on IRT, a greater presence of the latent trait, namely COVID-19 stress, will be required to respond to the higher response categories, as occurs in other instruments used during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021c , d , e ). While there is no prior evidence of MI for the CSS-36, it would be expected to be invariant between different sex groups, as has happened with other scales which measure mental health indicators during the current pandemic (e.g., Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on previous evidence, a five-factor structure is expected to present an adequate fit and show evidence of reliability ( Taylor et al, 2020e ; Abbady et al, 2021 ; Khosravani et al, 2021 ). Similarly, it would be expected that, based on IRT, a greater presence of the latent trait, namely COVID-19 stress, will be required to respond to the higher response categories, as occurs in other instruments used during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021c , d , e ). While there is no prior evidence of MI for the CSS-36, it would be expected to be invariant between different sex groups, as has happened with other scales which measure mental health indicators during the current pandemic (e.g., Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it would be expected that, based on IRT, a greater presence of the latent trait, namely COVID-19 stress, will be required to respond to the higher response categories, as occurs in other instruments used during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021c , d , e ). While there is no prior evidence of MI for the CSS-36, it would be expected to be invariant between different sex groups, as has happened with other scales which measure mental health indicators during the current pandemic (e.g., Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021b ). Previous literature indicates that women had a higher prevalence of stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic than men ( Pieh et al, 2020 ; Xiong et al, 2020 ; Kolakowsky-Hayner et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the smaller the error variance, the more accurately the true scores (or inherent attributes) are reflected in the observed scores ( Crocker and Algina, 1991 ). However, the item response theory (IRT) model has advantages over CTT and has been used for the evaluation of the psychometric properties of instruments measuring mental health indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in several Latin American countries (see Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2020 , 2021a , b , c ). IRT allows for establishing a relationship between item properties, individuals’ responses to these items, and the underlying trait being measured ( Steinberg and Thissen, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, specific scales have been developed to assess psychological problems resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, such as COVID-19 fear [11], COVID-19 anxiety [12], COVID-19 stress [13], pandemic grief [14], or COVID-19 phobia [15], some of which have been translated into Spanish and validated in the Peruvian context, such as the pandemic grief scale [16], fear of COVID-19 scale [17], coronavirus anxiety scale [18], COVID stress scales [19], among others. While these instruments measure important emotional responses characteristic of the early phases of the pandemic, there is a need for instruments that can provide information on changes in these emotional responses as the pandemic has progressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%