2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Validation of a New Version in Spanish of Four Items of the Preventive COVID-19 Infection Behaviors Scale (PCIBS) in Twelve Latin American Countries

Abstract: The invariance of the Preventive COVID-19 Infection Behaviors Scale (PCIBS) was evaluated in 12 Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay). A total of 5183 people from the aforementioned countries participated, selected using the snowball sampling method. Measurement invariance was assessed by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) and Multi-Group Factor Analysis Alignment (CFA-MIAL). In addition, item cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous evidence, a five-factor structure is expected to present an adequate fit and show evidence of reliability ( Taylor et al, 2020e ; Abbady et al, 2021 ; Khosravani et al, 2021 ). Similarly, it would be expected that, based on IRT, a greater presence of the latent trait, namely COVID-19 stress, will be required to respond to the higher response categories, as occurs in other instruments used during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021c , d , e ). While there is no prior evidence of MI for the CSS-36, it would be expected to be invariant between different sex groups, as has happened with other scales which measure mental health indicators during the current pandemic (e.g., Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous evidence, a five-factor structure is expected to present an adequate fit and show evidence of reliability ( Taylor et al, 2020e ; Abbady et al, 2021 ; Khosravani et al, 2021 ). Similarly, it would be expected that, based on IRT, a greater presence of the latent trait, namely COVID-19 stress, will be required to respond to the higher response categories, as occurs in other instruments used during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021c , d , e ). While there is no prior evidence of MI for the CSS-36, it would be expected to be invariant between different sex groups, as has happened with other scales which measure mental health indicators during the current pandemic (e.g., Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is part of a larger project aimed at obtaining brief, cross-culturally valid measures of mental health indicators in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic (see, for example, Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021a, 2021b. The study was conducted between June 12 and September 14, 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, CFA-MIAL becomes an alternative which allows for automating and simplifying MI (Marsh et al, 2018). However, CFA-MIAL is still rarely applied (Asparouhov and Muthén, 2014), with only a few relevant studies before (Jang et al, 2017) and during the pandemic (Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unobserved factors with multiple observed indicators, measurement invariance can be tested using multiple-group CFA. Measurement invariance involves four different levels: configural invariance, weak measurement invariance (also called metric invariance), strong measurement invariance (also called scalar invariance), and strict measurement invariance (Meredith, 1993;Widaman and Reise, 1997;Millsap, 2012;Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021). Configural measurement invariance is when there are the same number of factors and the same patterns of free and fixed factor loadings across groups without equality restrictions on any other model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong measurement invariance, also called scalar invariance, is defined as invariance of both factor loadings and item intercepts across groups. In general, when strong measurement invariance holds, the factor means across groups can be compared directly (Millsap, 2012;Caycho-Rodríguez et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%