2005
DOI: 10.1383/anes.6.1.14.57132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of acute and chronic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BBQ-Y was also used in this study. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) -This is arguably the most common and simple scale in pain research and practice [23]. The scale represents pain intensity dimension by a 10 cm plain line with two anchors points of "no pain" and "the worst pain I ever felt".…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BBQ-Y was also used in this study. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) -This is arguably the most common and simple scale in pain research and practice [23]. The scale represents pain intensity dimension by a 10 cm plain line with two anchors points of "no pain" and "the worst pain I ever felt".…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient marks on the 10 cm line, a point that best describes his or her pain level. The VAS is sensitive and reliable [23]. Odole and Akinpelu translated the VAS into the Yoruba language [24].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS represents the intensity of pain by a 10 cm line with two anchors of “no pain” and “the worst pain I ever felt.” 31 Odole and Akinpelu 32 reported a moderate correlation ( r = 0.63 [CI 0.49–0.69, P < 0.05]) between the English version and the translated Yoruba version of VAS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS represents the intensity dimension of pain by a 10 cm line with two anchors of "no pain" and "worst pain I ever felt" [27]. The VAS assesses pain intensity, has excellent psychometric properties, and has wide applicability in clinical and research settings [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%