2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06073-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the thrombosis risk of peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients using Caprini risk assessment model: a prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the current study identified that the Caprini assessment scale had a greater predictive value in the assessment of CRT than other models. This finding was consistent with that of Feng et al, wherein the Caprini scale was used for high-risk screening of the CRT in cancer patients, and the AUC value was 0.636 (95% CI: 0.590–0.680; P < 0.001) 25 . Unlike Feng et al, this study compared the predictive value of five different risk assessment scales simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the current study identified that the Caprini assessment scale had a greater predictive value in the assessment of CRT than other models. This finding was consistent with that of Feng et al, wherein the Caprini scale was used for high-risk screening of the CRT in cancer patients, and the AUC value was 0.636 (95% CI: 0.590–0.680; P < 0.001) 25 . Unlike Feng et al, this study compared the predictive value of five different risk assessment scales simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The conclusive scores were obtained from patients from General Surgery, Internal Medicine, outpatients, or intensive care unit (ICU), respectively 9 , 11 , 12 , 24 . Few studies have attempted to apply the classic VTE risk models to assess the thrombosis risk of PICC 25 , 26 . The Michigan risk score is the first risk model for CRT prediction in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There isn't a general agreement on the optimum method to choose potential predictors, hence this is a point of contention 11 . In the majority of research 16,21,22 , variable selection based on univariate statistical signi cance results in over t models. Other predictors were not examined because these predictors were screened as a single independent factor based on their statistically signi cant results 23 .…”
Section: Declarations Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current guidelines do not recommend routine preventive anticoagulation therapy [7]. Many researchers have assessed PICC-RVT risk prediction models to guide medical staff to take measures as early as possible [8][9][10]. Nevertheless, it was lacking in speci c cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%