BackgroundAlthough most acute promyelocytic leukemia(APL) with low-intermediate risk could survive the induction treatment, early death still a big problem to have effects on overall survival in real world.This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and possible predictors of early death in newly diagnosed patients with low-intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.MethodsSixty patients with newly diagnosed low/intermediate-risk APL admitted to Mianyang Central Hospital from January 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsSixty patients with a median age of 46 years (range, 17-75 years) were included. Fourteen patients (23.3%) were in low-risk group, and 46 patients (76.7%) were in intermediate-risk group. Fourteen patients (23.3%) died during induction treatment. Five patients died of hemorrhage, 5 of severe infection and 4 of differentiation syndrome. Multivariate analysis showed that HGB <65g/L at diagnosis (OR=38.474, 95%CI: 2.648~558.923, P=0.008) during induction treatment was an independent risk factors for early death in low- intermediate risk APL patients. In survival group, all patients achieved complete remission, the time to achieve remission was 25.87 ± 5.02 days, the average ATO dosage was 0.16 ± 0.03 mg/kg/day. In univariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in time span for remission when ATO dosage was in the 0.11~0.16mg/kg/day range. Compared with patients with low-risk APL, those with intermediate-risk APL had higher white blood cell counts (at diagnosis, day 3, day 5 and peak), higher level of lactate dehydrogenase, higher percentage of bone marrow promyelocytes, more platelet transfusions during treatment, and more early deaths (P<0.05). The overall survival of intermediate-risk APL patients seemed worse than those with low-risk APL (χ=5.033, P =0.025).ConclusionsIn patients with low-intermediate risk APL, HGB <65g/L at diagnosis was an independent risk factors for early death. Remission could still be achieved at low-dose ATO without affecting the required time for low-intermediate risk APL patients. Differences in clinical characteristics were found between low-risk and intermediate-risk APL. The intermediate-risk group had higher early mortality risk than the low-risk group.

This study aimed to explore the risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related venous thromboembolism (CRT) in patients with hematological malignancies and the predictive ability of the thrombotic risk assessment models (RAMs). The clinical data of the 117 eligible patients with hematological neoplasms at Mianyang Central Hospital with PICC from May 2018 to May 2020 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Thrombosis risk scores were calculated in patients with image-confirmed PICC-related thromboembolism. CRT occurred in 19 cases. Compared to the CRT-free group, the CRT group was older and showed higher body mass index (BMI), leukocyte count level, and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that BMI (P = 0.03) was a significant risk factor for CRT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Caprini scale (P = 0.01) was higher than that of the modified Wells scale (P = 0.94), the revised Geneva scale (P = 0.83), Padua scale (P = 0.59), and Michigan scale (P = 0.80). The sensitivity and specificity for the Caprini scale, Padua scale, modified Wells scale, the revised Geneva scale, and Michigan risk score were 63.3%/73.7%, 100%/0.00%, 95.9%/5.3%, 31.6%/73.7%, and 1.0%/99.0%, respectively. Caprini RAM had a better predictive ability for CRT in patients with hematological malignancies. Michigan risk score may not be better than Caprini RAM in this population.

The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with bortezomib-based triplet regimens without lenalidomide (PXD, including VTD, PAD, and VCD) followed by continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) treatment. The main objective is to evaluate the advantages of PXD followed by Rd compared to the combinations of bortezomib–lenalidomide–dexamethasone (VRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Fifty-eight nontransplant NDMM patients who were admitted to our department from 2017 to 2019 were included in this study. Bortezomib-based triplet regimens were initially selected and followed by Rd or Vd as continuous treatment once the patients achieved partial remission (PR) or better response. The efficacy and safety of the patients were observed. The Rd continuous treatment cohort was compared with historical data from the EVOLUTION trial on continuous VRd treatment. In our cohort, the overall survival rate was 100%, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.5% after a median of 19 (4–36) cycles of Rd continuous therapy was applied. During the follow-up period, the best outcome assessments achieved were 53.8% complete response (CR) and 84.6% excellent partial response (VGPR). A total of 23.1% had grade 3–4 or higher drug-related adverse reactions, mainly hematological toxicity, and no patients died of adverse reactions. Compared with the Vd group, the Rd group had a better PFS and VGPR rate (2-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.002; 3-year PFS: 69.2% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001; VGPR: 84.6% vs. 69.2%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in ORR (100% vs. 92.3%) or CR (53.8% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.082). Compared with the EVOLUTION study, patients in the Rd group had a more advanced disease stage (stage III rate of 40% vs. 19%, P = 0.039) and worse physical status (KPS 50–60 rate of 25.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.000). However, a higher proportion of ORR (100% vs. 73.0%, P < 0.001), VGPR or better (75.0% vs. 32.0%, P < 0.001), and PFS at 12 months (90.0% vs. 68%, P = 0.011) were achieved. Sequential administration of bortezomib-based triplet regimens without lenalidomide as an initial therapy followed by Rd as a continuous treatment may not be inferior to VRd for first-line treatment in NDMM patients.