This study aimed to explore the risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related venous thromboembolism (CRT) in patients with hematological malignancies and the predictive ability of the thrombotic risk assessment models (RAMs). The clinical data of the 117 eligible patients with hematological neoplasms at Mianyang Central Hospital with PICC from May 2018 to May 2020 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Thrombosis risk scores were calculated in patients with image-confirmed PICC-related thromboembolism. CRT occurred in 19 cases. Compared to the CRT-free group, the CRT group was older and showed higher body mass index (BMI), leukocyte count level, and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that BMI (P = 0.03) was a significant risk factor for CRT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Caprini scale (P = 0.01) was higher than that of the modified Wells scale (P = 0.94), the revised Geneva scale (P = 0.83), Padua scale (P = 0.59), and Michigan scale (P = 0.80). The sensitivity and specificity for the Caprini scale, Padua scale, modified Wells scale, the revised Geneva scale, and Michigan risk score were 63.3%/73.7%, 100%/0.00%, 95.9%/5.3%, 31.6%/73.7%, and 1.0%/99.0%, respectively. Caprini RAM had a better predictive ability for CRT in patients with hematological malignancies. Michigan risk score may not be better than Caprini RAM in this population.
The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with bortezomib-based triplet regimens without lenalidomide (PXD, including VTD, PAD, and VCD) followed by continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) treatment. The main objective is to evaluate the advantages of PXD followed by Rd compared to the combinations of bortezomib–lenalidomide–dexamethasone (VRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Fifty-eight nontransplant NDMM patients who were admitted to our department from 2017 to 2019 were included in this study. Bortezomib-based triplet regimens were initially selected and followed by Rd or Vd as continuous treatment once the patients achieved partial remission (PR) or better response. The efficacy and safety of the patients were observed. The Rd continuous treatment cohort was compared with historical data from the EVOLUTION trial on continuous VRd treatment. In our cohort, the overall survival rate was 100%, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.5% after a median of 19 (4–36) cycles of Rd continuous therapy was applied. During the follow-up period, the best outcome assessments achieved were 53.8% complete response (CR) and 84.6% excellent partial response (VGPR). A total of 23.1% had grade 3–4 or higher drug-related adverse reactions, mainly hematological toxicity, and no patients died of adverse reactions. Compared with the Vd group, the Rd group had a better PFS and VGPR rate (2-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.002; 3-year PFS: 69.2% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001; VGPR: 84.6% vs. 69.2%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in ORR (100% vs. 92.3%) or CR (53.8% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.082). Compared with the EVOLUTION study, patients in the Rd group had a more advanced disease stage (stage III rate of 40% vs. 19%, P = 0.039) and worse physical status (KPS 50–60 rate of 25.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.000). However, a higher proportion of ORR (100% vs. 73.0%, P < 0.001), VGPR or better (75.0% vs. 32.0%, P < 0.001), and PFS at 12 months (90.0% vs. 68%, P = 0.011) were achieved. Sequential administration of bortezomib-based triplet regimens without lenalidomide as an initial therapy followed by Rd as a continuous treatment may not be inferior to VRd for first-line treatment in NDMM patients.
BackgroundFalls are serious health events that can cause life-threatening injuries, especially among specific populations. This study assessed the risk factors associated with falls among inpatients with hematological diseases and explored the predictive value of fall risk assessment models.MethodsClinical data from 275 eligible hematology disease patients who visited Mianyang Central Hospital with or without falls from September 2019 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fall risk scores were determined in all included patients. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without falls. Binary logistic regression models were used to screen for potential fall-specific risk factors among hospitalized patients with hematology diseases.ResultsFalls occurred in 79 cases. Patients in the fall group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, visual impairment, hematological malignancies, and maintenance of stable disease stage, higher glucose levels, and a greater proportion of dizziness, nocturnal defecation, and receipt of intensive chemotherapy than those in the non-fall group (all P < 0.05). Fall patients were also more likely to have used diuretics, laxatives, sedative-sleeping drugs, analgesics, albumin, and calcium, and to have had catheters placed. The Barthel Index, grade of nursing care, support of chaperones, body temperature, nutrition score, and pain score also differed significantly between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the maintenance of stable disease stage (OR = 4.40, 95% CI 2.11–9.18, P < 0.001), use of sedative and sleeping drugs (OR = 4.84, 95% CI 1.09–21.49, P = 0.038), use of diuretics (OR = 5.23, 95% CI 2.40–11.41, P < 0.001), and intensive chemotherapy (OR = 10.41, 95% CI 3.11–34.87, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for falls. A high Barthel Index (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.97, P < 0.001), a high level of nursing care (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.98, P = 0.047), and availability of family accompaniment (OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.34, P < 0.001) were protective factors for falls. A ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of different fall-specific risk scales among inpatients with hematological diseases. The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Rating Scale had high sensibility and specificity with an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66–0.80, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Scale had a strong predictive value for falls among hospitalized patients with hematology diseases and can be recommended as a valid tool for clinical use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.