Asean Economic Integration Compared: What Do the Numbers Tell Us?

Abstract

In the comparative literature on regional (economic) integration processes, the ASEAN experience is often contrasted with the European (EU) integration process. More than any other integration process in the world, the ASEAN case is singled out as a counter-model for the EU. The ASEAN model is thereby associated with features such as: low levels of institutionalization, pragmatism, bottom-up or de facto regionalization, regional production platforms, and so on. The positive features of this ‘model’ are often emphasized; however, in recent years there have also been calls for deepening the institutionalization of ASEAN, including from the ADB. The purpose of our paper is double: On the one hand, we present a long-term meta-analysis of available indicators in order to compare more accurately the ASEAN experience with other integration experiences worldwide, and complement (and test) the mostly qualitative approaches in the comparative literature. This should allow to better identify convergences and divergences between ASEAN and other integration processes. On the other hand, by comparing ASEAN with benchmark cases, we shed new light on the potential for further deepening the economic integration process in Southeast Asia. The latter comparison is complemented with gravity-type model estimations to assess the potential for further developing intra-ASEAN trade. It is shown that ASEAN’s export space is expanding faster than the world average and that there is still space for ASEAN countries to further develop the role of its intra-regional trade. ASEAN can further improve the region’s competitiveness by reducing the non-tariff barriers and technical barriers, trade facilitation, strengthening regional value chains, facilitating factor mobility and enhancing regional cooperation.

Trade Liberalization and Firm Performance: The Case of Thailand

“…Several studies have analyzed the impact of the ASEAN FTA on trade and FDI. Chen, Cuyvers, and De Lombaerde (2017) have shown that ASEAN intraregional trade levels are approximately twice as high as the corresponding levels among other countries under similar conditions. Kawai and Naknoi (2017) find that ASEAN has had a positive reinforcing effect on both trade and inward FDI.…”

A Stimulator of Entrepreneurial Interest: BCM Entrepreneurship Learning and Training Model

“…Along with the rapidly increasing population in Indonesia in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and the development of industrialization in various developed countries, more and more problems have emerged that the Indonesian state is facing (Maryanti, Rohana, & Kristiawan, 2020). Especially if it is associated with competition from the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA), which means that ASEAN countries open a free trade system between member countries (Chen, Cuyvers, & De Lombaerde, 2017). It is possible that the labor market market in Indonesia will enter from foreign workers and vice versa, because competent and competitive quality human resources are needed (Perdana, 2019).…”

Website for E-Promotion in Industry 4.0

“…E-commerce has indeed become an excellent supporter of global economic development. Its dynamism is indeed a major business program related to the digital economy and its role is increasingly high because it is supported by the growth of internet users in the world [7]. In fact, success in E-commerce is half determined by whether consumers trust the goods we sell or not because their products cannot be directly seen or touched, and electronic purchases do not have a security system.…”