Articulations of Belonging: The Politics of Ethnic and Religious Pluralism in Bauchi and Gombe States, North-East Nigeria

Abstract

North-east Nigeria is an area of great ethno-linguistic diversity and religious pluralism, with Islam and Christianity both having a strong presence. The majority of the population is Muslim but there is also a substantial indigenous Christian minority, who form a majority in some local government areas. This paper draws on fieldwork by the authors in two north-eastern states, Bauchi and Gombe, to explore why, despite comparable religious demographics, there are marked differences in the levels of collective violence experienced in the two states. Although ethno-religious violence has increased across northern Nigeria since the 1980s, some areas have been more affected than others. To understand why this is, it is necessary to place ethnic and religious differences in their local historical and political contexts. This paper compares Gombe and Bauchi and argues that, although there are complaints of marginalization among different groups in both cases, Gombe State has developed a more inclusive system of government and local conflict management than Bauchi State. We explore what accounts for this difference in the articulation and management of belonging and whether the contrast is significant enough to explain differential levels of violence. In doing so, we consider how inter-ethnic and inter-religious relations have been shaped historically in the two cases and compare current forms of collective mobilization, considering different social and political spaces within each state. The paper also briefly outlines the impacts of the radical insurgent group Jama'at ahl al-sunna li'l-da'wa wa'l-jihad, nicknamed Boko Haram, in Bauchi and Gombe states.

Exploring The Social Factors Influencing Voting Behavior in 2019 National Assembly Elections in Gombe State, Nigeria

“…From the above analyses of all the themes and sub-themes, it can be understood that the manipulation of the identified social factors was instrumental in influencing voting behaviour in the 2019 National Assembly elections in Gombe state which ultimately led to voter intimidation. For instance, studies conducted by Sule (2019);Lar & Higazi (2015) affirms the informants' views that social factor did play a vital role in influencing voting behaviour resulting in the direct or indirect intimidation of the voters. Therefore, based on the discussions, the interview data is supported by the literature.…”

« Pastoralisme » et « insécurité » en Afrique de l’Ouest

“…Les tensions ont été avivées avec le « tournant démocratique » et la concurrence pour le contrôle des positions de pouvoir et des ressources associées (rente de l'État, emploi dans l'administration, infrastructures et services, définition du code pénal, contrôle de la terre, etc.) (Higazi, 2008(Higazi, , 2016(Higazi, , 2018Higazi & Lar, 2015). Elles puisent aussi leur source dans la constitutionnalisation de la catégorie d'« indigène », qui crée différents niveaux de citoyenneté à l'intérieur des États fédérés.…”

“…En théorie, ce statut est accessible à tout résident de long terme d'un État fédéré (Blench, 2017). Dans les faits, cet instrument légal renforce la manipulation du registre de l'autochtonie et structure la politique d'inclusion et d'exclusion au niveau local (Higazi & Lar, 2015), justifiant dans certains États fédérés du Centre et du Sud des retraits de terre aux Peuls et aux Haussa ainsi que le démantèlement du système d'école nomade mis en place par l'État fédéral au début des années 1980 au motif d'une priorité budgétaire aux « indigènes » (Blench, 2017). Dans le domaine foncier, cette manipulation est facilitée par la loi foncière de 1978 (Land use act) toujours en vigueur et qui confie la gestion des terres rurales aux collectivités locales et aux gouverneurs des États.…”

Perceived environment of ethnic diversity as a determinant of organisational identification in the public sector

“…Intracountry ethnicity, and in particular, how people identify with it within an organisational setting is under researched in the literature. Tensions around different ethnic groups hinge largely around the instrumentalist view that ethnic group membership forms a significant part of an individual's identity and that people are a priori motivated to benefit their own ethnic group (Higazi and Lar, 2015). In a workplace setting, this creates potential for undue bias or favouritism between employees of the same ethnicity (Oruwari, Owei, and Jev, 2004) and indeed the supremacy of ethnic identity over organisational identity.…”