2015
DOI: 10.13005/ojc/310302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Effects of Some Turkish Fodder Plants Belongs to Fabaceae Family (Vicia villosa, Trifolium ochroleucum and Onobrychis altissima)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the synergism between the antioxidant compounds in the extracts made the antioxidant activity dependent on concentration or the structure of the containing compound and the interaction between the antioxidant compounds. It can be seen that these results of the relationship between phenolic content and antioxidant property of this plant agree with this characteristic of some plant from previously reported 19,20 . …”
Section: Antioxidant Activity Of the Extractssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, the synergism between the antioxidant compounds in the extracts made the antioxidant activity dependent on concentration or the structure of the containing compound and the interaction between the antioxidant compounds. It can be seen that these results of the relationship between phenolic content and antioxidant property of this plant agree with this characteristic of some plant from previously reported 19,20 . …”
Section: Antioxidant Activity Of the Extractssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…vesicatoria. The obtained antimicrobial activity may correspond with the bioactive compounds which contained in the medicinal plant such as phenolic and flavonoid compounds as described in previous report [16][17][18] . For instance, Bounatirou et al, (2007) described that the main components in studied plant extract that showed the antimicrobial activity were terpene phenols 19 .…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activity Of the Crude Methanolic Extractsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…After harvest the WHC in VC+FYM+GM at 7.5 t ha-1 is 41.1705% which was 31.57% more prominent than the controlled scheme. After reap the HC in VC+FYM at 12.5 t ha-1 is 2.3529 cm hr-1 which was 25.53% further prominent than the controlled scheme 16 .…”
Section: Water Holding Capacity and Hydraulic Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 83%