2014
DOI: 10.5897/jmpr12.1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial activity of the leaf extract and fractions of Lupinus arboreus

Abstract: The antimicrobial effect of the leaf extract and fractions of Lupinus arboreus was investigated. The crude methanol extract (CME) of the dried leaves obtained by 48 h cold maceration was fractionated into n-hexane fraction (HEF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF), and methanol fraction (MEF); and evaluated using modified agar-well diffusion method. The results showed that the extract and fractions at varying concentrations, exerted strong antimicrobial activity on some of the test organisms. However, a weak activit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., B. subtilis) are known to be more sensitive to plant active extracts than Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa). This finding, as suggested by Ohadoma et al, indicates that the sensitivity to each group of bacteria is based on the fact that the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria is less complex than other groups and does not have the effect of the natural sieve against large molecules [2]. The results for the MIC are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., B. subtilis) are known to be more sensitive to plant active extracts than Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa). This finding, as suggested by Ohadoma et al, indicates that the sensitivity to each group of bacteria is based on the fact that the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria is less complex than other groups and does not have the effect of the natural sieve against large molecules [2]. The results for the MIC are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The MIC of plant fractions was evaluated by the microdilution method [2]. The fraction solutions were transferred in 80% DMSO, v/v (20,000 ppm, 50 µL) into 96 well plates in the first row.…”
Section: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Mic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One explanation is that the cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria are less complex than Gramnegative bacteria and do not have selectivity for large molecules [16]. The walls of these cells are composed of a thick layer of mucopeptides (peptidoglycan) (40-50% of the bacterial body weight), while the cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria contain layers of fat and peptidoglycan (20% and 5-20% of the body weight, respectively) [17].…”
Section: Aeruginosa)mentioning
confidence: 99%