1981
DOI: 10.1017/s002217240006962x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody responses after repeated influenza A virus immunizations among schoolchildren in Japan

Abstract: SUMMARYAntibody responses to influenza virus immunizations were examined among junior high school students. The students received two doses of a commercial split-product vaccine containing influenza A HINI during a 2-year period following the first appearance of HINI virus in the winter of 1977-78. In haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) tests, the students who had been infected with HiNt virus in 1977-78 showed a better response and wider cross-reactivity to the drift strain than the students who had not experie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gmt of NAI antibody levels peaked earlier than that of HI antibodies, and decreased in the same manner as HI antibodies. HI antibodies against A/New Jersey/8/76 (HswiNi) were observed only in those vaccinees who received the whole inactivated vaccination of A/New Jersey/8/76 (HswiNi) In a previous publication, we concluded that the present split-vaccine of influenza virus induces a limited spectrum of HI antibody reactivity against heterologous variants, especially in persons who have not experienced natural exposure to the virus, and that it is very difficult to achieve good immunity against NA antigen (Yamane et al 1981). Since then, our main efforts have been focused upon obtaining sufficient levels of immunity against influenza virus in unprimed individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gmt of NAI antibody levels peaked earlier than that of HI antibodies, and decreased in the same manner as HI antibodies. HI antibodies against A/New Jersey/8/76 (HswiNi) were observed only in those vaccinees who received the whole inactivated vaccination of A/New Jersey/8/76 (HswiNi) In a previous publication, we concluded that the present split-vaccine of influenza virus induces a limited spectrum of HI antibody reactivity against heterologous variants, especially in persons who have not experienced natural exposure to the virus, and that it is very difficult to achieve good immunity against NA antigen (Yamane et al 1981). Since then, our main efforts have been focused upon obtaining sufficient levels of immunity against influenza virus in unprimed individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(Palmer et al 1975;Yamane et al 1981). For the titration of antibody against the type-specific soluble ('s') antigens of influenza A and B viruses, the single-radial-complementfixation (SRCF) test was employed.…”
Section: Clinical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric mean titres of HI antibodies and the geometric mean concentrations of IgE and IgG antibodies were calculated with log transformation, and Student's paired t test was performed as previously described (Yamane et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The standard haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test was performed using the vaccine strains, A/Bangkok/10/83(H1N1), A/Philippines/2/82(H3N2) and B/USSR/100/83, as previously described (Yamane et al 1981).…”
Section: Serological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present in Japan, split vaccine of influenza virus is given annually to school children from kindergarten to senior high school age (1). Antibodies against both HA and NA antigens, but not against internal antigen, nucleoprotein (NP), have been reported to rise after split influenza virus vaccination (15). While it is necessary to titrate antibody levels against s antigen to distinguish natural infection from vaccine response, the standard CF test remains less popular for serodiagnosis than the HI test because it is somewhat more complex and time consuming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%