2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl012826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti‐Correlation between stratospheric aerosol extinction and the Ångström parameter from multiple wavelength measurements with SAGE II—A characteristic of the decay period following major volcanic eruptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Has background been reached? In hindsight it now seems clear, based on the volcanically quiescent period following Pinatubo, that background was not reached prior to Pinatubo [ Barnes and Hofmann , 2001; Hayashida and Horikawa , 2001], Figures 2, 3, and 4.…”
Section: Investigation Of Trends In the Long‐term Aerosol Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Has background been reached? In hindsight it now seems clear, based on the volcanically quiescent period following Pinatubo, that background was not reached prior to Pinatubo [ Barnes and Hofmann , 2001; Hayashida and Horikawa , 2001], Figures 2, 3, and 4.…”
Section: Investigation Of Trends In the Long‐term Aerosol Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on long‐term lidar measurements at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, Barnes and Hofmann [1997] suggest that the decay of aerosol loading following El Chichón and Pinatubo was influenced by the phase of the QBO in tropical stratospheric winds (also evident in the Garmisch lidar data [ Jäger , 2005]) and that integrated aerosol backscatter in 1995 was below any previous observation at Mauna Loa. Hayashida and Horikawa [2001] used SAGE II extinction measurements to derive Ångström parameters and concluded that the pre‐Pinatubo period was still influenced by volcanic eruptions from the mid‐1980s and cannot be considered a real background period. Barnes and Hofmann [2001] used the present background period, extending from 1996, to demonstrate variability correlated with the phase of the QBO, with implications for the source of background stratospheric aerosol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also presented measurements of integrated aerosol backscatter in 1995 which were below any previous observations at Mauna Loa. Another comparison of the pre‐Pinatubo and post‐Pinatubo periods was performed by Hayashida and Horikawa [2001] using SAGE II extinction measurements to derive Ångström parameters. They conclude that the pre‐Pinatubo period was still influenced by volcanic eruptions from the mid 1980s and cannot be considered a real background period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitivity analysis perturbing those two parameters within the values in the model atmospheres of Gallery et al (1983) shows that z refr typically lies between 12 and 14 km. (2) might be seen as a plausible representation of globally-averaged conditions (Hayashida & Horikawa 2001). The aerosol loading in scenario (3) is abnormally elevated for typical Earth conditions but may be representative of the atmosphere after a major volcanic eruption .…”
Section: The Earth In Transitmentioning
confidence: 99%