2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents of revisit intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
469
4
31

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(534 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
30
469
4
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Cole and Scott (2004) considered it to be the desire to visit, in a specific timeframe, a prior destination for a second time. As Um, Chon, & Ro (2006, p. 1141 argue, "Revisit intention has been regarded as an extension of satisfaction rather than an initiator of [the] revisit decision making process".…”
Section: Intention To Revisit a Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cole and Scott (2004) considered it to be the desire to visit, in a specific timeframe, a prior destination for a second time. As Um, Chon, & Ro (2006, p. 1141 argue, "Revisit intention has been regarded as an extension of satisfaction rather than an initiator of [the] revisit decision making process".…”
Section: Intention To Revisit a Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers have focused on factors that contribute to revisit intention (Alegre & Garau, 2011;Baloglu, 2000;Chen & Tsai, 2007), as it is better to attract visitors to come back than to look for new visitors (Um, Chon, & Ro, 2006).…”
Section: Intention To Revisit a Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ainda de acordo com a investigação de Um, Chon & Ro (2006), a Atratividade Percebida foi a variável com maior influência junto a intenção de retorno, inclusive, maior que a própria satisfação. Esta última foi influenciada fortemente pelas variáveis Atratividade Percebida, Qualidade e Valor, sendo a primeira citada (Atratividade Percebida) a mais influente também na explicação da satisfação.…”
Section: Modelo De Baker and Crompton (2000)unclassified
“…Attitudinal approaches focus on the willingness to return either as 'binary' variable Instead papers using a response variable in Likert scale utilize structural equation models (Jang and Feng, 2007;Lee, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Petrick, 2004;Oom do Valle et al, 2006), linear regressions (Kozak, 2001), or other techniques such as path analysis (Um et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors instead (Backman and Crompton, 1991b;Dick and Basu, 1994;Oppermann, 1999; encourage the utilization of measures of loyalty that would range on a continuum (Blattberg and Sen, 1976;Day, 1969). This attempt is partially pursued by those who use Likert scales in measuring the attitude towards returning (Jang and Feng, 2007;Lee, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Oom do Valle et al, 2006;Petrick, 2004;Um et al, 2006). However such a way allows obtaining only ordinal variables.…”
Section: Attitudes or Behaviours? Choosing The Response Variablementioning
confidence: 99%