Annona MuricataInspired Synthesis of CeO2 Nanoparticles and their Antimicrobial Activity

<p>Green Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (CeO₂ NPs) and Their Antimicrobial Applications: A Review</p>

“…23,24 Presently, CeO 2 NPs have attracted great interest as an antimicrobial agent, in particular against bacterial pathogens. 15,16,50 The exact mechanism of killing microbes is yet not clearly elucidated. However, it is proposed that CeO 2 NPs mostly kill microbes via a massive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, as shown in Figure 3.…”

Anti-bacterial activity of Annona muricata Linnaeus extracts: a systematic review

“…Supplementary Table 1 provides an overview of the key characteristics of the 14 publications available as full texts. The studies were published between 2005 and 2019, with the largest number of articles (n = 3) published in 2017 (Aruan et al, (Aruan et al, 2017;Bento et al, 2013;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Yasunaka et al, 2005). Among the selected studies, 57.14% used the MAST method (Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Dzotam et al, 2016;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Yasunaka et al, 2005), whilst 42.86% used the DDT method (Aruan et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010).…”

“…The studies were published between 2005 and 2019, with the largest number of articles (n = 3) published in 2017 (Aruan et al, (Aruan et al, 2017;Bento et al, 2013;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Yasunaka et al, 2005). Among the selected studies, 57.14% used the MAST method (Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Dzotam et al, 2016;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Yasunaka et al, 2005), whilst 42.86% used the DDT method (Aruan et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010). S. aureus was the most tested Gram positive bacterium (92.86%) (Aruan et al, 2017;Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010;Yasunaka et al, 2005).…”

“…Among the selected studies, 57.14% used the MAST method (Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Dzotam et al, 2016;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Yasunaka et al, 2005), whilst 42.86% used the DDT method (Aruan et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010). S. aureus was the most tested Gram positive bacterium (92.86%) (Aruan et al, 2017;Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010;Yasunaka et al, 2005). On the other hand, E. coli was the most tested Gram negative bacterium (85.71%) (Bento et al, 2013;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Dzotam et al, 2016;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010;…”

“…S. aureus was the most tested Gram positive bacterium (92.86%) (Aruan et al, 2017;Bento et al, 2013;Bussmann et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010;Yasunaka et al, 2005). On the other hand, E. coli was the most tested Gram negative bacterium (85.71%) (Bento et al, 2013;Andrade et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2017;Dzotam et al, 2016;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Haro et al, 2014;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sánchez-Navarro et al, 2018;Sebastiammal et al, 2019;Takahashi et al, 2006;Viera et al, 2010;Yasunaka et al, 2005). Reference strains were not employed in 21.43% of the tests (Aruan et al, 2017;Ezealisiji et al, 2017;Nugraha et al, 2019;Sebastiammal et al, 2019).…”