2008
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2008.2003332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Model for the Electron-Injection Statistics During Programming of Nanoscale nand Flash Memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling [2], [3], the injection spread ¡ÎÌ on CHE-programmed NOR devices displays a squareroot dependence on ¡Î Ì for small Î Ì shifts, revealing a nearly poissonian behavior for the electron injection process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling [2], [3], the injection spread ¡ÎÌ on CHE-programmed NOR devices displays a squareroot dependence on ¡Î Ì for small Î Ì shifts, revealing a nearly poissonian behavior for the electron injection process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large ¡Î Ì values, instead, ¡ÎÌ tends to saturate, clearly highlighting the sub-poissonian nature of the electron injection process that is due to the reduction of the tunnel oxide vertical field following each electron storage into the FG [1]- [3]. Note that ¡ÎÌ does not depend on the bit-line voltage used for CHE neither in the poissonian nor in the subpoissonian regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ideal case, the algorithm is expected to result in a V T distribution exceeding the program-verify level PV by an amount at most equal to the ISPP step (dashed lines in Figure 15). In reality, the distributions are widened by the program noise (not discussed here, see [158,159]) and by RTN and display the characteristic exponential tails. Note that no cell can have V T values below the program-verify level, as the algorithm would apply an additional step to them.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative analysis of the impact of charge detrapping on the width of the V T distribution after cycling and bake was reported in [239] and shown in Figure 28, normalized to the ISPP step V s . The two bottom-most contributions are related to the time-0 placement of the V T distribution-namely, the ISPP step V s and the fluctuation in the number of injected electrons per step [158,159,240]-and are not discussed here. The remaining part is made up of a native RTN contribution plus the additional terms induced by cycling.…”
Section: Effect On V T Distribution After Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] RTN is induced by capture/emission of single electron in a gate oxide trap, which is generated by fabrication process or program/erase cycling stress. Therefore, RTN results in threshold voltage (Vth) fluctuation as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%