2022
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2022.3170284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Insightful Assessment of 1T-DRAM With Misaligned Polarity Gate in RFET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the hold concentrations (of holes) remains same for hold '1' (H1) and hold '0' (H0). 18) Therefore, the 1T-DRAM memory operation is not possible in the conventional twin gate RFET structure, which is already mentioned in our previous work. However, RFET2 shown in Fig.…”
Section: Architectural Evaluation Of Rfetsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the hold concentrations (of holes) remains same for hold '1' (H1) and hold '0' (H0). 18) Therefore, the 1T-DRAM memory operation is not possible in the conventional twin gate RFET structure, which is already mentioned in our previous work. However, RFET2 shown in Fig.…”
Section: Architectural Evaluation Of Rfetsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The programming of state 1 (W '1') in the device is carried out through the generation of excess holes (n h1 ) in the device by the positive feedback mechanism initiated through impact ionization 16) in RFET1 whereas, in RFET2, W '1' mechanism has been executed through tunneling of holes across the Schottky barrier along with impact ionization. 18) Therefore, a positive PG bias is essential in RFET1 (to enable tunneling of electrons for impact ionization) in contrast to a negative front PG bias in RFET2 (to enable tunneling hole from metal to semiconductor). Excess holes generated in both devices after programming state (W '1') are stored underneath their respective storage regions i.e.…”
Section: T-dram Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from demonstrating the potential for logic applications with a reduced number of devices, RFET is also a potential candidate for 1T-DRAM [32,33]. The factors which support 1T-DRAM functionality in RFET include (a) intrinsic channel, (b) carrier generation mechanism [11], (c) location of storage region, (d) longer storage region, and (e) CMOS compatible fabrication process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we have shown the feasibility of 1T-DRAM with both three gated RFET [32], and twin gated RFET [33] technology. Due to the (a) better gate controllability, and (b) location of the storage region, a three gated RFET shows superior performance over the twin gated RFET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%