2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro evaluation of the effect of polishing on the stainability of different CAD/CAM ceramic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
23
4
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
23
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when polished with different polishing materials, ΔE* VE values were at an acceptable level for all the ceramic materials. All these values [ 21 , 28 , 32 ] are slightly lower than the VE values of the present study despite that all ΔE* are clinical in acceptable range (1 < (ΔE*—< 3.7) [ 18 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, when polished with different polishing materials, ΔE* VE values were at an acceptable level for all the ceramic materials. All these values [ 21 , 28 , 32 ] are slightly lower than the VE values of the present study despite that all ΔE* are clinical in acceptable range (1 < (ΔE*—< 3.7) [ 18 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Although the recorded ΔE* values were 1.96 (VS), 2.65 (VM II), and 3.07(VE) within the clinically acceptable values for the three tested materials, these values are consistent with Subaşi et al [ 30 ] (slightly above 2) for VS, Sarikaya et al[ 18 ] (2.094) for VM II, and Colombo et al[ 31 ] (< 3.3) for Zirconia. However, ΔE* values were lower than (3.83 and 4.9) recorded by Saba et al [ 17 ] for VE and VM II and Abu-Obaid et al[ 32 ] (< 3.3 for VE, VM II, VS). However, the values were higher than that of Alp et al[ 12 ] and Al Moaleem et al [ 14 ] who documented lower values than 1.0 for VS and 0.73 for VM II and Zirconia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ponadto adhezyjne połączenie materiału ceramicznego z twardymi tkankami zęba korzystnie wpływa na wytrzymałość konstrukcji protetycznej. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Ze względu na niedostateczną wytrzymałość mechaniczną i kruchość predysponującą do złamań i pęknięć, początkowo wskazania do stosowania uzupełnień całoceramicznych ograniczały się jedynie do pojedynczych koron i licówek oraz krótkich mostów w przednim odcinku łuku zębowego. Znaczny postęp technologiczny i rozwój materiałoznawstwa stomatologicznego, który dokonał się na przestrzeni ostatnich trzech dekad pozwolił na wykonywanie rozległych, wytrzymałych konstrukcji całoceramicznych również w obrębie zębów trzonowych.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In addition, the proper adhesion of ceramic material to hard dental tissues has a positive effect on the strength of the structure of the restoration. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Due to insufficient mechanical strength and brittleness predisposing to fractures and cracks, the indications for the use of allceramic restorations were initially limited to single crowns and veneers as well as short bridges in the anterior segment of the dental arch. Significant technological progress and the development of dental materials science, which has taken place over the last three decades, made it possible to extend durable, allceramic constructions to the molar region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%