1993
DOI: 10.1179/026708393790172321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aluminium and Al–4·5Cu alloy end chill: structural observation and heat flow analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One group of scientists performed extensive examination of end-chill directional solidification of Al-Cu alloys and reported the following effects of a higher melt superheat (50 to 200 K): a higher heat-transfer coefficient in the liquid state, a smaller air gap, a longer local solidification time, a larger columnar-grain zone, and faster growth of columnar grains. [10,11,12] Contrasting results are given by Ferreira et al [13] for upward unidirectional solidification of an Al-6.2 pct Cu alloy superheated by 20 to 110 K. They claim that the heat-transfer coefficient between the molten metal and the mold decreases with increasing melt temperature. As a result of the correspondingly slower solidification, the mushy zone becomes thicker and the inverse macrosegregation more severe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…One group of scientists performed extensive examination of end-chill directional solidification of Al-Cu alloys and reported the following effects of a higher melt superheat (50 to 200 K): a higher heat-transfer coefficient in the liquid state, a smaller air gap, a longer local solidification time, a larger columnar-grain zone, and faster growth of columnar grains. [10,11,12] Contrasting results are given by Ferreira et al [13] for upward unidirectional solidification of an Al-6.2 pct Cu alloy superheated by 20 to 110 K. They claim that the heat-transfer coefficient between the molten metal and the mold decreases with increasing melt temperature. As a result of the correspondingly slower solidification, the mushy zone becomes thicker and the inverse macrosegregation more severe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The IHTC was usually determined by using an inverse approach, which aims at minimizing the difference between the measured and simulated temperatures. For the sand and gravity die-casting process, extensive work has been performed for the determination of the IHTC and many factors were found to have an influence on the value of the IHTC, including the die coatings (material and thickness), [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] the die material and preheating, [1,[14][15][16][17] the casting size, [15,18] the application of pressure, [19][20][21][22][23] the orientation of the casting with respect to gravity, [1,15,24] the alloy composition, [14][15][16]25,26] and the surface roughness of the die. [7,14,[27][28][29][30] The heat transfer in HPDC process is different from most of the conventional casting processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%