2010
DOI: 10.25225/fozo.v59.i1.a9.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alien fish species in the Czech Republic and their impact on the native fish fauna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
66
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides its negative impact on the natural populations of small cyprinids in small water bodies (Lusk et al 2010), P. parva is an important food competitor for pond fish species . The species has been described as an omnivore (Muchačeva 1950;Šebela & Wohlgemuth 1984;Weber 1984), but has also been considered as planktivorous (Rosecchi et al 1993;Priyadarshana et al 2001;Sunardi et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides its negative impact on the natural populations of small cyprinids in small water bodies (Lusk et al 2010), P. parva is an important food competitor for pond fish species . The species has been described as an omnivore (Muchačeva 1950;Šebela & Wohlgemuth 1984;Weber 1984), but has also been considered as planktivorous (Rosecchi et al 1993;Priyadarshana et al 2001;Sunardi et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other European countries, the first period is similar to that in Slovakia. In the second period, the number of introductions has gradually increased up to the present (Crivelli 1995;Elvira & Almodovar 2001;Copp et al 2007;Hesthagen & Sandlund 2007;Verreycken et al 2007;Lusk et al 2010). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the number of introduced fish species, Czechoslovakia with 36 non-native fishes (24 exotic and 12 translocated) occupied the 3 rd position while, in relation to the area of the country, it occupied the 14 th position. It was mainly the Czech Republic that, as the part of the former common state (Czechoslovakia), was the source of introductions carried out in Slovakia (Lusk et al 2010). Furthermore, Hungary was also the source of the spontaneous spreading of exotic invasive species such as Ameiurus nebulosus, Ameiurus melas, Carassius gibelio, Pseudorasbora parva, Lepomis gibbosus, Gasterosteus aculeatus and Table 2.…”
Section: Present Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are increasingly often recognised both in Poland (Witkowski 2002, Grabowska et al 2010) and in other regions, but their complete and objective assessment is not always possible (Cowx 1997, Bartley and Casal 1998, Cowx and Gerdeaux 2004, Van Zyll de Jong et al 2004, Casal 2006, Uzunova and Zlatanova 2007, Gozlan 2008, Lusk et al 2010. Moyle et al (1986) termed the impact of introduced fishes on native species the "Frankenstein effect".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%