2018
DOI: 10.24106/kefdergi.346652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Toksisiteye İlişkin Algıları

Abstract: Örgütsel toksisite ya da örgütsel zehirlenme, toksik davranışlar olarak sınıflandırılan bireysel faktörlerin bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkar. Bundan dolayı, bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı üniversitelerdeki akademisyenlerin algılarına göre algılanan örgütsel toksisite, toksisitenin algılanan etkileri ve toksisiteyle başa çıkma düzeylerini incelemektir. Çalışma için gerekli verilerin toplanması için karma araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya 116'sı erkek ve 90'ı kadın olmak üzere toplam 206 akademisyen seçkis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another finding of the study was that the perceptions of toxic leadership decreased emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and decreased the sense of personal accomplishment. Demirdağ (2018) conducted a study on the academicians' perceptions of organizational toxicity. In order to collect the data of the quantitative part of the data collected by mixed method, Organizational Toxicity Scale developed by Kaşalak (2015) was applied.…”
Section: Studies On Toxic Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another finding of the study was that the perceptions of toxic leadership decreased emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and decreased the sense of personal accomplishment. Demirdağ (2018) conducted a study on the academicians' perceptions of organizational toxicity. In order to collect the data of the quantitative part of the data collected by mixed method, Organizational Toxicity Scale developed by Kaşalak (2015) was applied.…”
Section: Studies On Toxic Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, STEM education should be included in educational programs from early childhood education to higher education level (Aydagul & Terzioglu, 2014;Breiner et al, 2012;Bybee, 2010). Although STEM education practices are of great importance at primary, secondary and higher education levels (Bolatli & Korucu, 2018;Cotabish et al, 2013;Deveci, 2018;Gokbayrak & Karisan, 2017;Ince, Misir, Kupeli, & Firat, 2018;Park & Yoo, 2013;Ross & Gray, 2012;Robinson, 2016;Yildirim & Turk, 2018), the implementation of STEM education in early childhood is a matter of interest. Lots of questions have been raised, especially about the implementation of this kind of education in Turkey, so studies have been carried out (Akgunduz & Akpinar, 2018;Balat & Gunsen, 2017;Basaran, 2018;Cetinkaya-Aydin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stem Education and Stakeholder's Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is not enough research in this field in Turkey. The studies conducted so far emphasize the characteristics of STEM education (Arikan, 2018;Aydeniz, 2017;zamijeniti s Bahar et al, 2018;Yasar et al, 2018), teachers/prospective teachers' opinions on STEM education (Bakirci & Kutlu, 2018;Gulgun et al, 2017;Ozbilen, 2018;Ugras & Genc, 2018 ) or necessity and effects of STEM education on students at primary and high school levels (Bolatli & Korucu, 2018;Cotabish et al, 2013;Deveci, 2018;Gokbayrak & Karisan, 2017;Ince et al, 2018;Park & Yoo, 2013;Ross & Gray, 2012;Robinson, 2016;Yildirim & Turk, 2018). Studies on STEM education in early childhood are limited (Akgunduz & Akpinar, 2018;Balat & Gunsen, 2017;Basaran, 2018;Milford & Tippet, 2015;Tippett & Milford, 2017;Yasar Ekici et al, 2018).…”
Section: Stem Education and Stakeholder's Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation