2005
DOI: 10.1080/14742830500051812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After New Social Movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary multicultural and transnational societies have become sites of multiple types of participation, not all of them linked to official parliamentary politics (Soysal, 1994). New social movements (Wieviorka, 2005) have led to new forms of political participation and mobilisation (Stott and Reicher, 2012), focusing for example on the domain of culture (Nash, 2001), religion (Modood, 2010) or gender (Phillips, 2009). These identity politics call for a new understanding of participation, one that is not limited to the official political sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary multicultural and transnational societies have become sites of multiple types of participation, not all of them linked to official parliamentary politics (Soysal, 1994). New social movements (Wieviorka, 2005) have led to new forms of political participation and mobilisation (Stott and Reicher, 2012), focusing for example on the domain of culture (Nash, 2001), religion (Modood, 2010) or gender (Phillips, 2009). These identity politics call for a new understanding of participation, one that is not limited to the official political sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorsque l'État était l'interlocuteur privilégié et souvent unique des mouvements de la société industrielle, l'organisation hiérarchique et de masse permettait de construire un rapport de force face à lui et de faire émerger des leaders forts aptes à négocier avec l'État. Les mouvements ont désormais une multiplicité de cibles (États, institutions internationales, entreprises...) qui se situent à différents paliers (Armstrong et Bernstein, 2008 ;Wieviorka, 2005). La structure en réseau leur permet d'adapter leur approche à chacune de ces instances qui sont souvent à la fois des adversaires, des partenaires et des objets de pressions de la part des réseaux altermondialistes.…”
Section: Valorisation Des Réseauxunclassified
“…Klandermans (1986), M. Diani (1992;, N. A. Pichardo (1997), D. Della Porta and M. Diani (2006), S. Simsek (2004), M. Wiewiorka (2005). A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%