1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-1223(98)80001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic design of a natural laminar flow nacelle and the design validation by flight testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 The important outcome of that activity was the existence of free-flight limiting N factors, which were introduced as stability limits in computational methods for the design of laminar gloves for the ATTAS wing, 28 the ELFIN wing, 29 the fin on the Airbus A320, 30 and the nacelle. 31,32 Contrary to the free-flight situation, the limiting N factors for wind tunnels are specific quantities depending on the flow quality of the considered facility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 The important outcome of that activity was the existence of free-flight limiting N factors, which were introduced as stability limits in computational methods for the design of laminar gloves for the ATTAS wing, 28 the ELFIN wing, 29 the fin on the Airbus A320, 30 and the nacelle. 31,32 Contrary to the free-flight situation, the limiting N factors for wind tunnels are specific quantities depending on the flow quality of the considered facility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] In many ways, the problem of the sustainment of laminar flow over an engine nacelle is much less restrictive than the equivalent investigations on aircraft wings, as lift generation is not the primary function. Early analytical studies on the effectiveness of a natural laminar flow nacelle [7][8][9][10] indicated that a potential drag reduction of up to 2% of total aircraft drag could be achieved, without incurring a weight penalty, solely by maintaining laminar flow on an engine nacelle. This was reinforced in the NASA study by Obara 11 who indicated that the percentage drag reduction on a typical business jet configuration could be increased from 12 to 24% by extending laminar flow over all aircraft surfaces, rather than limiting efforts to the wing alone.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance penalties from heavier nacelles with more drag may ultimately outweigh the efficiencies gained from the engine cycle and hence designers will aim for increasingly short and slim fan cowls [2] [3]. There has been a resultant effort to understand the aerodynamics of nacelles and provide improved solutions for future engines [4,5,6]. A 'slimline' nacelle is expected to be incorporated in future, large engine designs [5] however the aerodynamic performance of these designs may be a limitation, particularly at off design conditions or when installed in the pressure field around an aircraft wing [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%