2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nacelle design for ultra-high bypass ratio engines with CFD based optimisation

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Appropriate values for these key nacelle dimensions are determined with a fully parametric definition that uses the intuitive class-shape transformation (iCST) method [13,14]. The design process is based on a multi-point, multi-objective optimisation routine based on a well-established CFD methodology [4,[15][16][17]. The domain, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stage 1: Selecting a Representative Nacelle Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Appropriate values for these key nacelle dimensions are determined with a fully parametric definition that uses the intuitive class-shape transformation (iCST) method [13,14]. The design process is based on a multi-point, multi-objective optimisation routine based on a well-established CFD methodology [4,[15][16][17]. The domain, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stage 1: Selecting a Representative Nacelle Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3d. The mesh independence and validation of this numerical approach have been reported in a number of previous studies [4,16,21], and details of the methodology used for the current optimisation process are set out extensively by Swarthout [11].…”
Section: Stage 1: Selecting a Representative Nacelle Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Figure 2, the reference engine fan radius is set r n = 1.7 m; the sizing is completed comparing different relations presented in the literature [30][31][32]: L n = 1.272r n , r max = 1.252r n , r s = 0.28r n and L s = 1.5r s . The shapes of the inlet section are built using Class Shape Transformation (CST) curves, following [30,33,34]. The metalining is placed on the internal surface of the inlet, starting from z ms with an overall length of L ms ≈ 0.7λ BPF divided into eight cells of equal width w ms = 0.05 m. In the present study, the MS is positioned close to the lip leading edge: the treatment extends in a currently non-lined part of the nacelle as its presence in the nacelle is not intended to be an alternative to the standard absorbing liners.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…leading and trailing edge radii, mean camber, thickness distribution, etc. for its resemblance to twodimensional airfoil theory [9][10][11] ) played the role of design variable, participating subsequent design space establishment. [12][13][14] However, the three-dimensionality essential to blade design failed to be reflected in this approach of geometric parameterization, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%