2010
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2010.2041293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing Dynamic Process Changes in High Volume Plasma Etch Manufacturing by Using Multivariate Process Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) is obtained, an optimization problem with constraints can be solved with a quadratic objective function described in Eq. (4) in order to obtain optimum MVs in MIMO control [12][13][14][15] J ¼ min…”
Section: Optimization Problems With Oes Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) is obtained, an optimization problem with constraints can be solved with a quadratic objective function described in Eq. (4) in order to obtain optimum MVs in MIMO control [12][13][14][15] J ¼ min…”
Section: Optimization Problems With Oes Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) in order to obtain optimum MVs in MIMO control [12][13][14] J ¼ min (6) by using the data from design of experiment, an optimization problem with constraints can be solved with a quadratic objective function described in Eq.…”
Section: Dynamic Optimization Techniques For Multiple Input Multipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in different chambers is caused from the behavior of different etching equipments, which means the bias is in the chamber. However, most of the existing studies for advanced process control (APC) have investigated the CD variation reduction regarding the within-wafer, W2W and L2L CD control (El Chemali et al 2003;Williams et al 2005;Zhang, Poolla, and Spanos 2008;Parkinson et al 2010). Little research addresses the CD control between lots etched in different chambers to compensate the bias in etching process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%